Editorial: Modulation of Reward Circuitry by Pain and Stress
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Modulation of Reward Circuitry by Pain and StressAcute pain is a necessary, physiologically relevant phenomenon that serves as a warning signal for actual or potential tissue damage.It engages a complex and dedicated circuitry within the peripheral and central nervous system to signal and control the sensation of pain.Importantly, it is generally well managed by established analgesics, such as NSAIDs or opioids.Chronic pain, on the other hand, persists beyond any physiologically relevant purpose and becomes a disease state in and of itself.We now understand that chronic pain leads to adaptations in the sensory nervous system that distinguishes it from acute pain-a phenomenon that may contribute to its stubborn persistence in the face of the typical pharmacological armory.One limitation to the classical approach to treatment of pain is the myopic focus on the sensory aspects of pain.However, pain has an equally important affective component.Over long periods of pain stimuli, engagement of affective or reward circuitry can impact underlying mood states, as illustrated by the fact that depression is one of the most common co-morbidities with chronic pain.Moreover, stress, which commonly accompanies on-going pain, can also modulate reward circuitry and has been implicated in prescription analgesic addiction and drug relapse.An emerging question is whether chronic pain can also induce adaptations in reward circuits that contribute to the severity and chronicity of this challenging disease, and the impact this may have on opioid misuse disorders.This Research Topic includes several original research and review articles discussing the impact of chronic pain on reward circuitry.They provide evidence for how chronic pain changes reward circuitry, its interactions with the stress system, and the implications this has for the genesis of psychiatric disorders such as depression and addiction.The review by Dos Santos et al. provides a thorough introduction to the neuroanatomical underpinnings of pain and reward.Evidence is presented from both clinical and preclinical chronic pain studies suggesting significant neuroadaptations within these circuits that may contribute to the chronification of pain and mental co-morbidities such as depression and anxiety.Strategies that restore normal function of these circuits may be beneficial in treating both the sensory and emotional symptoms associated with chronic pain.This review is complemented nicely by the original research article by Wang et al.In this study, the authors explored changes in cortical activation following acute or chronic pain.Using DeltaFosB as a marker of neuronal activation, they found chronic, but not acute pain, stimulated DeltaFosB expression in the medial prefrontal cortex.This provides further evidence for activity-related changes in circuits involved in reward and motivation in chronic pain.The DeltaFosB activation in the medial prefrontal cortex was also observed in a chronic stress model (maternal separation), highlighting the shared pathologies between chronic pain and stress paradigms.Engagement of reward circuits in chronic pain will undoubtedly impact a myriad of pain-related behaviors, including pain hypersensitivity and negative affect.In the review by Gandhi et al., the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,012 | 0,015 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,016 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».