MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2777600826

Shooting From the East: Filmmaking on the Canadian Atlantic by Darrell Varga (review)

2016· article· en· W2777600826 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
John McCullough

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMovie theaterHollywoodFilmmakingMedia studiesPoliticsSociologyFilm theoryNationalismPraxisArt historyAestheticsHistoryArtLawPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SHOOTING FROM THE EAST: FILMMAKING ON THE CANADIAN ATLANTIC By Darrell Varga Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2015, 384 pp.REVIEWED BY JOHN MCCULLOUGHDarrell Vargas new book, Shooting from East, may have achieved un-thinkable: he's provided an account of Canadian film production culture so lively that it actually encourages us to watch films he writes about. Including lots of excerpts from personal interviews with filmmakers, close readings of both familiar and unfamiliar work, and some revelations from archives, book assumes a stance at once theoretically rigorous and rhetorically down-to-earth. For instance, between snippets from theorists Henri Lefebvre, Horni Bhabha and Bill Nichols, we find author referring to characters in some of films as locals, geezers and oddballs, which immediately serves to deflate much of cultural capital of high theory. Or, rather, and this is probably closer to Vargas intention, theory he's using is woven with raw material of everyday; in this book, theories about spatial relations, nationalism, racial relations, global culture and class relations provide a rich lens through which to imagine radical possibilities of cinema.Many of films and related activities and events that are featured in Shooting from The East are meant to serve as examples of cinema as political praxis, one that challenges centrist bias and privilege of Canadian cinema and suffocating effects of global commercial cinema most often associated with Hollywood. There's a wealth of proof of viability of this radical cinema politics, Varga argues, if one considers richness and integrity of best of Adantic filmmaking culture-from art films made in region to film co-ops that sustain a diverse range of filmmaking practices. But, this requires a change of perspective and, throughout book, Varga explains how meaning of cinema depends on who determines centre, and where that centre is located. In spirit of Canadian scholars going back as far as Grant and Innis, but using language of contemporary theory, Varga asserts that, viewed from a critical spatial perspective, the discourse of power is written on space of nation (323). The dominance of Central Canada- Ottawa-Montreal-Toronto corridor-throughout nation's filmmaking history has positioned all other sites of film activity as regional, by default. By approaching his subject in this manner, Varga helps us understand how every regional cinema begins its life in a sort of debt position, always working to break even. To break even in this scenario would mean to gain a degree of autonomy and a level of support that is currently denied film artists; or, more precisely, these very qualities are actually set against each other, particularly so in neoliberalism, so that artist is now given choice of having autonomy but not support, or they can have support but not autonomy. The books informed and spirited response to this context gives it an assertive, even aggressive, edge-captured in title-making it a unique and important contribution to scholarship about film in Canada.If focus of book was only to lament dominance of Toronto it would quickly lose its charm. Instead, having introduced conceptual problems of centrism and regionalism, Varga proceeds, in Chapter 1, to high road of close readings and critical analysis-the bedrock of film studies-by looking at his favourite films: those of Bill MacGillivary and magnum opus by Brothers Jones and NIFCO, The Adventures of Faustus Bidgood. These are all in art film tradition and Varga applauds creative autonomy, freedom and innovation that characterises such work. Providing details from personal interviews with filmmakers and extensive research and close readings, chapter makes a compelling argument for considering ruins of art film as a refuge against onslaught of entertainment films that conceptualize all places as space to be colonized. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,166
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,334

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,075
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,159 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207