The Psychoanalytic Theme in Margaret Atwood's Fiction: A Response to Burkhard Niederhoff*1
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IIn Margaret Atwood's 2003 dystopian novel, Oryx and Crake, the protagonist and narrator Jimmy - later known as Snowman - persistently presses the beautiful and enigmatic Oryx for details of her exotically traumatic past; Tell me one thing (114), he pleads. Born into geographically un-located third world poverty and sold into child slavery - working first as beggar, then filmed for paedophilic pornography - before entering North America as state-sanctioned sex worker, Oryx's history is litany of degradation and abuses. For Jimmy, this necessarily equates to trauma; Oryx has suffered, in Ian Hacking's term, spiritual lesion, wound to the soul (Hacking 4).2 Faced with her determined refusal to recover and examine further memories of her exploited childhood, Jimmy reads Oryx's reluctance as an admission of unacknowledged horror and shame; thought he understood her vagueness, her evasiveness. 'It's alright/ he told her, stroking her hair. 'None of it was your fault'; but Oryx deflects his sympathy with the maddeningly ingenuous response: None of what, Jimmy? (114). Oryx refuses Jimmy's invitation to speak her trauma, to enact a recovery of lost memories of pain (Hacking 3), and thereby achieve self-knowledge and self-acceptance. Discussing the novel's interrogation of Crake's purportedly therapeutic scientific project (Dunning 87), Stephen Dunning suggests that, through her silence, Oryx both secures herself against penetrating intellectual curiosity and becomes the of perpetual mystery (96). Despite her silent resistance, however, Jimmy simply amalgamates her reticence within psychoanalytic narrative of repression and denial: Where was her rage, he ponders; how far down was it buried, what did he have to do to dig it up? (142).In his insistence that Oryx should react 'appropriately' - with anger, hatred and distress - to her childhood trauma, and in his assumption that about the past will bring her greater clarity (and that such insight would be ipso facto beneficial), Jimmy casts himself in the role of psychoanalyst and saviour. He invites Oryx to enter into the talking cure (Freud, Psychoanalysis 184) - to undergo what Sigmund Freud once referred to as cleansing of the soul (Psychoanalysis 184) - and be healed. In his pursuit of her unconscious self, vague recollections become dreamlike memory symbols (Psychoanalysis 187) with revelatory potential; chasing incidental details that resist signification, Jimmy fantasises about psychoanalytic breakthroughs: there it would be, the red parrot, the code, the password, and then many things would become clear (138). It is certainly curative procedure that Jimmy himself would like to engage in. last man standing in post-apocalyptic world, Jimmy longs for sympathetic ear into which he might unburden his heavy soul, and he cries out in his desolation: Just someone, anyone, listen to me please! (45). Atwood, however, proves sceptical of the psychoanalytic - specifically, Freudian - method. As auditor-analyst, Jimmy, who first encounters Oryx as just another little girl on porno site (90), is inextricably entangled in web of voyeurism, vicarious thrills, and pleasurable indignation. And as implied western readers of this exotically oriental misery memoir, we too are painfully, irresistibly, implicated in Jimmy's desire to plumb ever greater depths of poverty and sexual degradation. truth, it seems, does not always set us free, and revelations of past traumas are not always productive and therapeutic. This anxiety around the efficacy of psychoanalytic practice - as Niederhoff valuably demonstrates in his article on Atwood - is concern that the writer repeatedly returns to in her fiction.IIIn The Return of the Dead, Niederhoff compares Atwood's 1972 novel Surfacing to the 1996 novel, Alias Grace. former, which Niederhoff rightly notes has attained the status of classic work of contemporary fiction, commences with its unnamed narrator heading up into northern Quebec in search of her missing father. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».