MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2778254559

The Psychoanalytic Theme in Margaret Atwood's Fiction: A Response to Burkhard Niederhoff*1

2009· article· en· W2778254559 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fiona Tolan

Notice bibliographique

RevueConnotations · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOryxPsychoanalysisDystopiaLiteratureArtSociologyHistoryPsychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IIn Margaret Atwood's 2003 dystopian novel, Oryx and Crake, the protagonist and narrator Jimmy - later known as Snowman - persistently presses the beautiful and enigmatic Oryx for details of her exotically traumatic past; Tell me one thing (114), he pleads. Born into geographically un-located third world poverty and sold into child slavery - working first as beggar, then filmed for paedophilic pornography - before entering North America as state-sanctioned sex worker, Oryx's history is litany of degradation and abuses. For Jimmy, this necessarily equates to trauma; Oryx has suffered, in Ian Hacking's term, spiritual lesion, wound to the soul (Hacking 4).2 Faced with her determined refusal to recover and examine further memories of her exploited childhood, Jimmy reads Oryx's reluctance as an admission of unacknowledged horror and shame; thought he understood her vagueness, her evasiveness. 'It's alright/ he told her, stroking her hair. 'None of it was your fault'; but Oryx deflects his sympathy with the maddeningly ingenuous response: None of what, Jimmy? (114). Oryx refuses Jimmy's invitation to speak her trauma, to enact a recovery of lost memories of pain (Hacking 3), and thereby achieve self-knowledge and self-acceptance. Discussing the novel's interrogation of Crake's purportedly therapeutic scientific project (Dunning 87), Stephen Dunning suggests that, through her silence, Oryx both secures herself against penetrating intellectual curiosity and becomes the of perpetual mystery (96). Despite her silent resistance, however, Jimmy simply amalgamates her reticence within psychoanalytic narrative of repression and denial: Where was her rage, he ponders; how far down was it buried, what did he have to do to dig it up? (142).In his insistence that Oryx should react 'appropriately' - with anger, hatred and distress - to her childhood trauma, and in his assumption that about the past will bring her greater clarity (and that such insight would be ipso facto beneficial), Jimmy casts himself in the role of psychoanalyst and saviour. He invites Oryx to enter into the talking cure (Freud, Psychoanalysis 184) - to undergo what Sigmund Freud once referred to as cleansing of the soul (Psychoanalysis 184) - and be healed. In his pursuit of her unconscious self, vague recollections become dreamlike memory symbols (Psychoanalysis 187) with revelatory potential; chasing incidental details that resist signification, Jimmy fantasises about psychoanalytic breakthroughs: there it would be, the red parrot, the code, the password, and then many things would become clear (138). It is certainly curative procedure that Jimmy himself would like to engage in. last man standing in post-apocalyptic world, Jimmy longs for sympathetic ear into which he might unburden his heavy soul, and he cries out in his desolation: Just someone, anyone, listen to me please! (45). Atwood, however, proves sceptical of the psychoanalytic - specifically, Freudian - method. As auditor-analyst, Jimmy, who first encounters Oryx as just another little girl on porno site (90), is inextricably entangled in web of voyeurism, vicarious thrills, and pleasurable indignation. And as implied western readers of this exotically oriental misery memoir, we too are painfully, irresistibly, implicated in Jimmy's desire to plumb ever greater depths of poverty and sexual degradation. truth, it seems, does not always set us free, and revelations of past traumas are not always productive and therapeutic. This anxiety around the efficacy of psychoanalytic practice - as Niederhoff valuably demonstrates in his article on Atwood - is concern that the writer repeatedly returns to in her fiction.IIIn The Return of the Dead, Niederhoff compares Atwood's 1972 novel Surfacing to the 1996 novel, Alias Grace. former, which Niederhoff rightly notes has attained the status of classic work of contemporary fiction, commences with its unnamed narrator heading up into northern Quebec in search of her missing father. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,970
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,630

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,274
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConnotationsMême sujetUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionTravaux en français237 207