THE RIGHT TO SELF IMAGE: THE CONSENT GIVEN TO CREATE OR USE A PERSON’S IMAGE IN THE NEW CIVIL CODE. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT. right to self provided by art. 58 of the new Civil Code is a personality right, a primary right for everyone, next to the rights to life, health, physical and mental integrity, honor and reputation, respect for the private life. Like the name, the represents an identifying element for the person and this supposes that every person is entitled to oppose to the disclosure, by any means, of elements of his/her life and to the reproduction of the without his/her consent. possibility of a person to prevent the use of his/her is based on individual autonomy.Keywords: personality, personality right, agreement, valuable consideration, reproduction, image-source, image-reproduction, privacy, legal prerogatives, the memory of the deceasedThe right to self provided by art. 58 of the new Civil Code is a personality right, a primary right for everyone, next to the rights to life, health, physical and mental integrity, honor and reputation, respect for the private life.1The right to self is a particular right because its features are not exactly the same as the general features of those other rights. Thus, the right to self may be subject to an agreement for valuable consideration, consequently the can be sold and its extra-patrimoniality is only relative. Today, we are witnessing a shift of the right to image, from an absolute to a relative right.2The term good off trade has become relative. If the transmission of the human body is problematic,3 the same cannot be said about the acts through which we dispose of ourselves, without alienating us; these transactions are perfectly legitimate. With some reservations, particularly the respect for the human dignity, the agreements through which a right to use a person is granted, are perfectly lawful, no matter the elements of the personality: the concession of body use, of labour, image, voice and personal information. These agreements can be concluded for valuable consideration, but that does not transform the elements of the human person in heritage elements because the heritage acquires only alienable assets.4Article 73 of the new Civil Code, entitled The right to self image provides: (1) Every person has the right to his/her own image. (2) In exercising the right to self image, he/she may prohibit or hinder the reproduction in any manner, of his/her physical appearance or voice or, where appropriate, the use of such reproduction. provisions of art. 75 remain applicable.5Like the name, the represents an identifying element for the person and this supposes that every person is entitled to oppose to the disclosure, by any means, of elements of his/her life and to the reproduction of the without his/her consent. possibility of a person to prevent the use of his/her is based on individual autonomy.6The right to is an autonomous right, analyzed however in the context of the personality protection, but many authors considered it included in the right to privacy. A violation of the right to must be considered independently from a violation of the privacy. Moreover, the capture of a person's is worth the same, whether it is done in public or in private places7.However, the European Court of Human Rights recognized the person's right to his/her own as a component of the respect for privacy. publication of a person's without his/her consent, which would have the effect of prejudicing him/her materially or morally, is an infringement of art. 8 of the Convention. In the case Peck v. the United Kingdom, 2003, broadcasting on television, in an informing campaign, the of the applicant during an attempted suicide, surprised by a camera that was part of a closed circuit, constituted a serious and disproportionate violation of his private life and, consequently, an infringement of art. 8.8Following the example of article 36 of the Quebec province Civil Code, the New Civil Code shows in article 74, nine examples of cases of privacy violation, but we are interested only in three of them, namely: the capture or use of the or voice of a person found in a private place, without his/her consent, the dissemination of materials containing images of a person in medical treatment facilities, as well as of personal data concerning health, problems of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, circumstances related to the disease and other various facts, including autopsy results, without the concerned person's consent, and if the person is deceased, without the femily or entitled persons' consent; the use in bad faith of the name, image, voice or resemblance to another person. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».