MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2778606229 · doi:10.1353/his.2017.0055

Horse-and-Buggy-Genius: Listening to Mennonites Contest the Modern World par Royden Loewen

2017· article· fr· W2778606229 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marlene Epp

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistoire sociale · 2017
Typearticle
Languefr
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgriculture and Farm Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeniusCONTESTDramaHistoryActive listeningSociologyLiteratureArt historyArtPhilosophyTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Horse-and-Buggy-Genius: Listening to Mennonites Contest the Modern World par Royden Loewen Marlene Epp Loewen, Royden–Horse-and-Buggy-Genius: Listening to Mennonites Contest the Modern World. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2016. Pp. 243. If anyone who watched the CBC TV popular crime-drama Pure in winter 2017 came away with many questions, then this book is a must-read. Perhaps viewers with no questions, who took the show at face value, should read it too. Loewen's book focuses exactly on the two distinct branches of Mennonites that the drama conflates into one—the Old Order Mennonites of Swiss-Pennsylvania-German descent, and the Old Colony Mennonites of Dutch-Russian descent. Both of these historically ethnic branches display a continuum from "modern" to "anti-modern." Loewen uses the latter term to describe what might seem the most "conservative" of Mennonites, whom outsiders note for their agricultural work, use of horses and buggies, and plain dress; they also limit the use of electricity. Using interviews with 250 individuals in 35 communities, which Loewen and his research assistants conducted in Canada and Latin America, this study helps us understand why they live that way. Part one has two chapters on the Old Order in Ontario and in other regions of Canada, and part two has five chapters on the Old Colony in Mexico, Belize, Paraguay, and Bolivia, reflecting the disparity in numbers—8,000 and 100,000, respectively. The chapters explore transportation, agricultural methods, responses to technology, church practices, family life, migrations, social mores, and relations with host societies, governments, and other outsiders. A central question throughout relates to the question of "change." At one level, the fundamental goal of the horse-and-buggy peoples to resist change—particularly rapid technological shifts that cause acculturation among modern folk. But Loewen exactingly differentiates "lesser" changes—dress fabric, fuel source, house materials, buggy styles, tire type—which are permissible, from significant changes that might challenge "the close-knit, self-sufficient agrarian community" (p. 218) that lies at the heart of the groups' anti-modernity. In short, motorized vehicles are not a problem per se; rather, the resulting speed and distance compromise shared religious beliefs and kinship relationships. The interviews reveal that many customs exist because "it has always been that way." What outsiders often view as a "lifestyle" turns out to be much deeper than superficial choices based on trends, income, or peer pressure. Loewen uses the intriguing descriptor "genius" to characterize the vital links between "religious faithfulness" and lives "lived in the local and in simplicity" (p. 3). He proposes that suspicion of technological progress, urban living, distance from nature, and individualism may well provide a better way into the future than does modernization. The book notably brings together historic branches of Mennonites into one study revolving around their common anti-modernism. These streams share comparable views on scripture regarding their place (or non-place) in "the world." One might have wished for more discussion of the groups' differences, beyond a brief section in the Conclusion; for example, the impact of ongoing migration (Old Colony) versus a more stationary history (Old Order) on responses to the [End Page 469] external world. How important, or not, is the national and geographical context (Latin America versus Canada) within which each group lives? Scholars and the general public tend to either romanticize or vilify horse-and-buggy people. To his credit, Loewen appears to do neither, but rather allows conservative Mennonites to explain their traditions and choices in their own words—allowing the outsider a rare chance to thus "listen in" on these communities. Even so, at times the analysis stops short of dealing with apparent inconsistencies of thought and practice among these peculiar people. The study cites the advantages of large families to the family economy and community survival, but not the difficulties that numerous childbirths pose to women. As well, outsiders find it difficult to reconcile the co-existence of pacifist religious beliefs co-existing with domestic violence, sexual abuse, and corporal punishment; Loewen at least does point to the limitations of traditional teachings on forgiveness and patriarchal privilege. Throughout the volume, the horse-and-buggy people...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,038
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,075

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,004
Communication savante0,0060,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistoire socialeMême sujetAgriculture and Farm SafetyTravaux en français237 207