2017 AOS Student Presentation Awards
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The AOS proudly recognizes the students receiving honors for the best oral presentations given at the 135th stated meeting of American Ornithology in East Lansing, Michigan. These awards are not ranked. They honor excellence in presenting original, significant science that advances our understanding of birds and their conservation. The Student Presentation Awards Committee chairs are Matt Carling and Morgan Tingley. The 2017 awardees (listed in alphabetical order of last names for categories with multiple awardees) are as follows: Sarah Dzielski, Cornell University Poster: What's in a feather? Reconstructing mercury concentrations through time using museum specimens The Nellie Johnson Baroody Award recognizes an outstanding oral presentation by a student given on any topic. The award was established in 1980 by an anonymous donor, who endowed a fund in honor of the individual's early mentor, Mrs. Baroody, an amateur birdwatcher in Berwyn, Illinois. The award includes an honorarium and a framed certificate. Kristin Bianchini, University of Saskatchewan Presentation: Effects of oil contaminant exposure on pre-migratory fuelling in two shorebird species The Robert B. Berry Award recognizes the best oral presentation by a student on the subject of conservation. The award was established in 2007 at the annual meeting in Laramie, Wyoming, through the generous gift of Mr. Berry, a Wyoming rancher, philanthropist, falcon breeder, and conservationist. The award includes an honorarium and a framed certificate. 2017 AOS Student Presentation Award winners: (from left to right) George Cummins, Amélia Roberto-Charron, Kristin Bianchini, Tara Imlay, Katie Schroeder, Kyle Horton, Desiree Narango, Shane DuBay, Sarah Dzielski, Nick Mason. Tara Imlay, Dalhousie University Presentation: Carry-over effects from wintering to breeding for Barn and Cliff swallows Janice Kelly, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presentation: Conspecific and heterospecific responses to perceived density for breeding habitat selection The Mark E. Hauber Award recognizes the most outstanding oral presentation by a student on avian behavior. The presentation must include statistical analysis of the behavior of individually identifiable birds in the wild or in captivity. The award was established in 2015 through a generous gift by Dr. Hauber, the 18th editor of The Auk and a dedicated ornithologist and behavioral scientist. The award includes an honorarium and a framed certificate. George Cummins, Northern Arizona University Presentation: Evolution of response to nest predators in passerines Shane DuBay, University of Chicago Presentation: Bird specimens track 135 years of atmospheric soot and environmental policy Kyle Horton, University of Oklahoma Presentation: The migrant turnstile, quantifying 21 years of migration through the Gulf of Mexico Nick Mason, Cornell University Presentation: Song evolution, vocal learning, and speciation in passerine birds Desiree Narango, University of Delaware Presentation: Non-native plants reduce reproductive success of an insectivorous bird Katie Schroeder, East Carolina University Presentation: Vocalizations in a non-passerine: What can call structure tell us about an individual king rail? The Council of the American Ornithological Society recognizes students at each annual meeting for their outstanding oral presentations given on any subject. The award includes an honorarium and a framed certificate.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle