Theatre and Immigration: From the Multiculturalism Act to the Sites of Imagined communities/Theatre et Immigration: De la Loi Sur le Multiculturalisme Jusqu'aux Lieux De L'imaginaire National
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In English Canada 1988 Canadian Multiculturalism Act instigated study of ethnic, multicultural, and intercultural theatre practices. (2) In Quebec 1977 Bill 101 or Charter of French Language, which established fundamental language rights of people of Quebec and so presented the most prominent cite of struggle over Quebecois culture and nationhood, framed similar scholarly and artistic questions (Knowles and Mundel XVI). Today, however, with growing number of immigrants landing in English Canada and Quebec, urban theatre audiences have become increasingly diverse and artists' performances no longer need to appeal either to traditional white middle-class audience of Canada's so-called 'main stages' [...] nor to communities narrowly defined by culture or interest (XVII). This special issue takes this statement further and focuses on cultural, personal, and artistic output of theatre artists who have been working in Canadian theatre for several decades. It argues that representation of an immigrant/immigration on stage constitutes a self-referential move in Canadian theatre. increased presence of theatre artists actively contributing to English Canadian and Quebec theatre today invites audiences to rethink such fundamental concepts as nationalism and multiculturalism. Moreover, as this issue demonstrates, artists' theatrical aesthetics and concerns situate questions of immigration within wider discourse and practices of theatre as it relates to globalization and mobile identities worldwide. Hence, articles chosen for this issue aim to measure artistic output of Canadian theatre using theoretical lenses of postcolonial and intercultural performance theories, studies in linguistics and cultural semiotics, psychoanalysis, and cultural geography. They continue discussion of intercultural theatre practices in Canada and Quebec, initiated by Theatre Research in Canada and Jeu; (3) and reflect ongoing debates on theatre and immigration in Canada that took place at 2013 and 2014 annual meetings of Canadian Association for Theatre Research; and as proposed in my own work on theatre and exile (2012). Terminology wise, this issue moves away from metaphorical and somewhat poeticized term exilic artist, someone found in and/or seeking position of existential estrangement or being an outsider, augmented by social, political, economic, and physical conditions of flight (Meerzon 4-8). (4) It employs a more pragmatic concept: we use term artist, adapted after Citizenship and Immigration Canada's (CIC) definition of political refugees, skilled workers, investors, entrepreneurs, and self-employed people as immigrants, eligible to seek employment in Canada. Such an immigrant must have Canadian or foreign educational credentials, demonstrate a sufficient knowledge of English or French, and have at least one year of continuous full-time paid work experience in one's primary occupation (Skilled Immigrants). term theatre artist refers to a newcomer to Canada who holds a post-secondary diploma in theatre, has work experience in trade, and aims to earn a living in Canada or Quebec by working in theatre in English and/or in French. When Canadian Liberal government revised its immigration policies and made obtaining refugee status more accessible in mid-1990s, Canada became one of most desirable countries for migration. This move created what Bricker and Ibbitson call The Big Shift (2), most significant change in Canada's population in late twentieth century: Our population is up 5.9 percent from what it was five years ago {roughly 2010}. About a third of this increase is due to natural population growth (more people being born than dying). other two-thirds--67 percent, to be precise--is due to immigration {. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,028 | 0,034 |
| Communication savante | 0,017 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».