Hollywood North: The Feature Film Industry in British Columbia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
HOLLYWOOD NORTH: THE FEATURE FILM INDUSTRY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA Mike Casher Vancouver: UBC Press, 2002, 176 pp. Though the title implies conventional expository history, do not be fooled. Gasher's character sketch of the British Columbia feature film industry is theoretically informed and notable for its self-reflexive stance, its textual analysis of B.C. feature films, and its richly detailed material account of the industry. A central preoccupation of the author is the question of what we are to make of the B.C. film industry as industry with clearer links to Hollywood than to As location-based industry established partly by B.C.'s aptitude for disguise in Hollywood features, the B.C. film industry (or is it the film industry that happens to be in B.C.?) lends itself to paradox, and that is precisely what interests Gasher. For him, the B.C. Film Commission's promotional stance that empties of its specificity goes beyond mere irony: it challenges the ways in which and cinema are thought to interact. Hollywood North does trace the development of the industry and the practice of thinking about B.C. as cinematic place, but it also deliberately subverts the tendency to reify the relationship between film production and the reflection of culture. Rooted in sense of material history, Gasher's book poses significant challenge to traditional ways of contending with cinema and culture in Canada. Inherently, the book offers itself as problematic within the context of nation, since what is to be made culturally of cinema based almost entirely on the American industrial model? Gasher suggests that cultural-reflection bias among scholars and critics of Canadian cinema studies might have led them to ignore B.C. because its film industry does not conform to what are widely considered to be more culturally informed film industries in Quebec or Ontario. But Gasher does not simply favour political economy approach as an antidote. Instead, he reconfigures cultural approach to industry and local cinema in the midst of global flows, an approach that is informed by thinkers such as Harold Innis and Doreen Massey. Hesitant to call the B.C. industry symptom of globalization, Gasher instead prefers Massey's concept of place or global/local interface, where is imagined as a particular constellation of social relations, meeting and weaving together at particular locus. While the social relations that Gasher describes are largely American in terms of the film industry, the conceptualization of B.C. as locus is not simply attributed to favourable exchange rates for American capital. Rather, Gasher's sense of is configured within an Innisian framework of flow in which tradition of exporting raw or semi-processed materials continues in the context of the B.C. film industry, in the form of the labour of British Columbians and the export of B.C. locations. Meeting place is also how the book might be described with reference to the dialogue Gasher creates from breadth of scholarship. The introductory chapter takes the book from the informational to an informed treatment of theoretical problematic. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».