One Nation Under Baseball: How the 1960s Collided with the National Pastime by John Florio and Ousie Shapiro
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: One Nation Under Baseball: How the 1960s Collided with the National Pastime by John Florio and Ousie Shapiro Paul Hensler John Florio and Ousie Shapiro. One Nation Under Baseball: How the 1960s Collided with the National Pastime. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2017. pp. 222. Cloth, $29.95. Among the decades of the twentieth century, the years that comprise the 1960s offer a time in which the landscape of the United States endured its greatest upheavals politically and culturally. Looking back on that era, we see how the strands of civil rights disputes, assassinations, and an unpopular war merged into a contentious and uncomfortable fabric. While many Americans continued to enjoy the consumerism of post-World War II society, those benefits could not stanch the cries of African Americans for racial equality nor did they prevent several U.S. presidents from ratcheting up the nation's military involvement in Vietnam as part of the ongoing Cold War. This is the Zeitgeist into which John Florio and Ouisie Shapiro bring readers of their latest work, One Nation Under Baseball, as they juxtapose those days' current events with their relation to the national pastime. The authors' collaborative effort is likely to please an audience of Baby Boomers who desire to look back at a formative time of their lives as well as those who want a glimpse of the highlights of baseball's actions and reactions during the transformative Sixties. However, it is also a book that will frustrate more knowledgeable readers seeking a deeper, more scholarly probe into—as the book's subtitle states—"how the 1960s collided with the national pastime." By catering to the former group at the expense of the latter, the results are mixed. In its favor, One Nation is very accessible in that it is written in two hundred brisk pages that touch on a multitude of subjects taken in chronological order, beginning with a poignant breakfast meeting in 1960 between pitcher Mudcat Grant and then presidential candidate John Kennedy. By immediately introducing the demographic difference between a rurally raised black ballplayer and a white politician born to wealth, the existing divide between the races is made abundantly clear and shown elsewhere in the text to demonstrate that those who stoked the flame of Jim Crow were determined to let it burn. Other themes coursing through the book include contentious labor issues between baseball club owners and their hired hands, the players who delivered the game for the benefit of fans in the stands and those viewing or listening at home. A less obvious factor that began to emerge in the 1960s is the output of a group of younger baseball writers who chose to report on the game from beyond the diamond and thereby move away from the beat of the traditional reporter. The "Chipmunks," as they were called, "were proud to be [End Page 249] set apart from the stodgy veterans, to be college-educated liberals who were printing stories the old guard wouldn't touch" (73). Florio and Shapiro do well in focusing on this brash subset of media writers because one of them, Leonard Shecter, would become Jim Bouton's partner-in-crime when the former Yankee hurler penned his landmark Ball Four. While Bouton's iconoclastic diary is a well-known staple among sports books, the point made by the authors is that as the decade progressed, the players became further emboldened to stake their claim through gains in racial equality—with the desegregation of spring training camps—and freedom of expression. Concerning financial matters, Marvin Miller, the new head of the players association, exerted more pressure on team ownership to share revenues, while Curt Flood and his challenge to the reserve clause waited in the wings. Although baseball is the book's overriding theme, Florio and Shapiro incorporate other familiar figures and events into the narrative to color it appropriate to the times. The Beatles, rioting in Watts, Muhammad Ali's refusal to be drafted, the silent protest of John Carlos and Tommie Smith at the 1968 Summer Olympics, and the first lunar landing all contribute to the triumph and tumult that imbued an unforgettable era. Documentary aspects...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».