MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2781660508 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2017.0051

The World Wide Web of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge: On the Global Circulation of Broughamite Educational Literature, 1826–1848

2017· article· en· W2781660508 sur OpenAlex
Thomas Palmelund Johansen

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)MultitudeGlobeBiographyHistoryMedia studiesSociologyPolitical scienceLawArt historyPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The World Wide Web of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge:On the Global Circulation of Broughamite Educational Literature, 1826–1848 Thomas Palmelund Johansen (bio) The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge (SDUK) was a central agent in the development of the British market for popular educational literature in the 1830s and '40s. This London-based philanthropic society of middle-class gentlemen was well known for its publications on science, history, biography, and other useful subjects. Between 1826 and 1848, these tracts were printed in series such as the Library of Useful Knowledge, the Library of Entertaining Knowledge, and the Working Man's Companion. The society also published the Penny Cyclopaedia, the British Almanac, and most famously, the Penny Magazine. Most scholarly work on the SDUK has concentrated on the domestic British context.1 While some studies have acknowledged a connection between foreign settings and the SDUK in London, they have not investigated the character and function of these connections or located the SDUK in the wider context of worldwide developments in adult education.2 In her now classic (though unpublished) 1933 thesis on the SDUK, Monica C. Grobel devoted the final chapter to an overview of the connections between the society in London and a multitude of institutions and individuals across the globe. Her preliminary findings suggest that the SDUK not only made a significant contribution to British debates on popular instruction, science, and cheap print but also played a role in global educational reform movements and the associated markets for cheap periodicals. Grobel concludes her thesis with the following call to future historians: "How far [the SDUK] was instrumental in shaping the whole course of educational theory and practice not only within the British Isles, but also throughout the civilized world in the nineteenth century is for the [End Page 703] twentieth century to ascertain."3 Grobel's ambition of writing a singular world history was replaced by an even more ambitious objective in the last decades of the twenthieth century: to excavate contextualised histories of education, science, political thought, or religion in places located outside the "civilized world" that were free of Western or imperial narratives. But lately historians have begun to posit more synthetic narratives in the fields of science and educational history.4 This article builds upon Grobel's work by investigating the diverse functions of the SDUK's periodical publications in a global context. I argue that the SDUK played an instrumental role in the early nineteenth-century global educational movement. The secular nature of these publications enabled them to serve very different and sometimes conflicting ends. The Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge The SDUK was established in 1826 by the Whig lawyer, politician, and champion of educational reform Henry Brougham, in collaboration with a group of scientists, attorneys, and leading industrialists with liberal Whig and utilitarian convictions. In his widely read pamphlet Practical Observations upon the Education of the People (1825), Brougham expressed his support for the mechanics' institute movement.5 Brougham furthermore called for the establishment of a society that would provide cheap periodical literature to meet the demands of a rapidly expanding reading public. Several SDUK members were deeply involved in the popular education movement, serving as founding members of the University of London (1826). Brougham, James Mill, and William Allen also played a role in the establishment of the British and Foreign School Society (1808), a key promoter of the Lancasterian monitorial system of education, which was arguably the first attempt to internationalize educational theory and pedagogy.6 The SDUK was one of the most ambitious educational initiatives of its time. By exploiting the newest technologies in printing to further its popular education aims, it became a model for initiatives in countries with radically different educational agendas. One of the society's objectives was to steer its publications clear of any religious or political controversy. Its secular focus distinguished it from its rivals, such as the Society for the Propagation of Christian Knowledge and the evangelical Religious Tract Society, on the one side, and the cheap, seditious unstamped political papers on the other. High Church and evangelical advocates widely perceived the SDUK to be dangerously...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,909
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle