MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2781764532 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2017.0056

"There Will Ever Be an Aristocracy of Talent": The Mason College Magazine, 1883–1900

2017· article· en· W2781764532 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anne B. Rodrick

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAristocracy (class)CreedCollege educationSociologyMythologyMedia studiesGender studiesHistoryClassicsLawPoliticsPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

"There Will Ever Be an Aristocracy of Talent":The Mason College Magazine, 1883–1900 Anne Rodrick (bio) Mason Science College, Birmingham, opened its doors in November 1880. Founded by manufacturer Josiah Mason, whose rags-to-riches story entered local mythology long before his death, the college was designed "to give thorough systematic education and instruction to all who might come, unfettered by restrictions of class, creed, race, or sex."1 While Mason privileged science education above literary studies for those "who have to enter early upon the business of life," he insisted that his college also provide "classical education" for men and women, both in "regular systematic instruction" for day students and "popular instruction" in the evenings.2 Ninety-five full-time day students entered in the first class. Within a year, fifty-three of those students had founded the Mason College Union, and in January 1883 they inaugurated the Mason College Magazine, which appeared monthly and then quarterly until the college was absorbed into the University of Birmingham in 1900. This article examines the ways in which two generations of Mason students used the magazine to explore their own fluid understandings of higher education; they did so within the pages of a journal that purportedly represented all Mason College students but in time became more interested in asserting elitist notions of intellectual competence. The first generation of editors, from 1883 to about 1892, was focused on forging intense, almost familial, bonds inspired by the shared experience of creating "the Mason student"; the second generation, from about 1893 to 1900, was a more self-confident group of students who regarded their predecessors as quaintly enthusiastic and provincial. Their engagement with the ideals of higher education was focused on the many meanings of a university pedigree. Examining the ways in which students claimed a higher status over time provides insight into Victorian anxieties [End Page 787] over status, access, inclusivity, and credentialing in higher education in ways that prefigure debates in today's university institutions. Mason College was founded to fill a gap in local and regional higher education.3 Birmingham was already home to Queen's College, a local medical school whose students would form an important, if unassimilated, cohort of Mason science students until the two colleges were officially conjoined in 1892.4 It also boasted the Birmingham and Midland Institute, which had absorbed the local mechanics' institution and a variety of other adult education institutions in 1854. By 1880, the Midland was a widely respected provider both of evening education for artisans through its industrial department and of consistently well-attended public lecture programs and other cultural events through its general department. While the industrial department inspired a fiercely loyal following of teachers and students, it was not designed to facilitate courses of study that could lead to university examinations. Mason College was envisioned as an institution that would provide access to full-time, purposeful, coherently organized college instruction for day students, both male and female, who would inevitably sit for degrees through the University of London. For upwardly mobile workers, there were also courses of evening lectures on "science" topics, priced at ten shillings per term or three pence per lecture.5 Josiah Mason had imagined these day and evening programs as parallel tracks, each leading to the kind of structured higher education he himself had never enjoyed. The day students were consistently described as pursuing a "thorough and systematic education,"6 and their numbers rose from ninety-five in the first session to 615 by 1897–98.7 However, Mason governors quickly realized that "systematic" and "standardized" were not interchangeable: many day students, especially women, took only one or two courses per session and preferred a smorgasbord approach over a set curriculum.8 Perhaps the most famous of these early day students was Constance Naden, the poet-philosopher whose six-year Mason career was divided between taking science courses outside of any preset curricular guidelines and producing a steady output of poetry and prose, much of which was published in the Mason College Magazine.9 She and her fellow day students—men and women pursuing relatively independent courses of study—were the "earnest and enthusiastic" individuals...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,097

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,005
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,075
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,241 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesTravaux en français237 207