Caregivers satisfaction with care received by paediatric oncology patients admitted at the University Teaching Hospital-Lusaka Zambia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Diagnosis of cancer is a traumatic event that does not only affect the diagnosed patients but also their caregivers. Supportive interventions are therefore essential for the caregivers to go through the cancer pathway and attain a sense of satisfaction for both medical and none medical services. Therefore evaluating the extent to which patients and their caregivers are satisfied with health services is clinically relevant as satisfied patients are more likely to comply with treatment, take an active role in their own care, continue using medical care services and stay under the care of a health provider.Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study that investigated caregiver satisfaction with care received by paediatric oncology patients at the Paediatrics University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka-Zambia. Purposive sampling was used to select study participants and all caregivers who were available in the paediatric oncology ward at the time of data acquisition were selected resulting into a sample size of 50 caregivers. Data was collected using a structured interview schedule.Results: More than half 26 (52%) of the respondents were knowledgeable about cancer disease, 13 (26%) were partially knowledgeable with only 11 (22%) were not knowledgeable. Despite high knowledge levels, 19 (38%) did not know the cancer stage of their child. The majority 30 (60%) of patients had partial access to cancer treatment with only 3 (6%) who reported having full access to treatment. Concerning professional support, majority 47 (94%) received good or very good support from the staff while only 3 (6%) received poor support. When all the factors assumed to influence satisfaction were considered, 18 (36%) of the respondents were very satisfied, 19 (38%) were partially satisfied with only 13 (26%) who were not satisfied with care received. Of the five factors which were hypothesized to influence caregiver satisfaction, only professional support had a significant association with caregiver satisfaction with a p value of .004.Conclusions: Only professional support had a significant association with caregiver satisfaction against all other factors hypothesized to influence satisfaction, implying that if appropriate profession support is given, caregivers are more likely to get satisfied with care and consequently comply with treatment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».