MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2782099884 · doi:10.1182/blood.v130.suppl_1.1812.1812

Pomalidomide (POM) + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LoDEX) Safety and Efficacy in Patients (pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Previously Treated with a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) and in Whom Last Prior Therapy with Lenalidomide (LEN) Failed

2017· article· en· W2782099884 sur OpenAlexaff
David Siegel, Gary J. Schiller, Kevin Song, Richy Agajanian, Ketih Stockerl-Goldstein, Hakan Kaya, Michaël Sébag, Christy Samaras, Ehsan Malek, Giampaolo Talamo, Christopher S. Seet, Jorge Mouro, Faiza Zafar, Weiyuan Chung, Shankar Srinivasan, Max Qian, Amit Agarwal, Anjan Thakurta, Nizar J. Bahlis

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of CalgaryRoyal Victoria HospitalVancouver General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePomalidomideInternal medicineNeutropeniaMultiple myelomaLenalidomideBortezomibClinical endpointCohortAdverse effectSurgeryPopulationGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

BACKGROUND POM + LoDEX is a standard of care for the treatment of pts with RRMM. The MM-014 (NCT01946477) trial is investigating the treatment sequence of POM + LoDEX as third-line treatment in pts with RRMM with LEN-based treatment failure as last prior therapy (cohort A). Outcomes are reported for cohort A, including a subset analysis of pts who received prior PI and/or bortezomib (BORT). METHODS Adult pts with RRMM who had received 2 prior lines of treatment and had progressive disease (PD) after ≥ 2 cycles of second-line LEN-based therapy were eligible. Pts received POM 4 mg/day on days 1 through 21 + LoDEX 40 mg/day (20 mg/day if aged > 75 years) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 28-day cycles, with mandatory thromboprophylaxis. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response) by modified International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), safety, and second primary malignancies (SPMs). RESULTS At the data cutoff date of May 3, 2017, median follow-up was 23.8 months in the surviving pts.Baseline characteristics for all 56 pts enrolled in cohort A and for pt subgroups with prior PI or BORT exposure are shown in Table 1. Of 50 pts with cytogenetic data by fluorescence in situ hybridization, 4, 4, and 2 pts were positive for del17p, t(4;14), and t(14;16), respectively. Median duration of prior LEN-containing treatment was 23.6 months (range, 3.5-107.0 months), with 60.7% of pts receiving an immediately prior LEN dose of 25 mg/day. All pts were refractory or relapsed to their most recent prior LEN-containing regimen: 92.7% and 92.3% of pts were LEN refractory in the prior PI and prior BORT exposure subgroups, respectively. Response and PFS outcomes in the overall cohort A population and by prior treatment exposure are reported in Table 2. Among the 56 pts, 50 discontinued treatment, with 29 pts (58%) discontinuing due to PD, 6 due to withdrawal, 5 due to adverse event (AEs), 3 due to lack of efficacy, 2 due to death, and 5 due to other reasons. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs included anemia (26.8%), neutropenia (10.7%), and infections (23.2%, including pneumonia [14.3%]). Two pts experienced grade 3/4 pulmonary embolism, and 2 pts had SPMs. CONCLUSIONS POM + LoDEX is safe and effective when sequenced in third line following second-line LEN-based treatment failure in pts with RRMM who had also received prior BORT or other PI. With > 10 months of additional follow-up as previously reported (Siegel et al. EHA 2017 [abstract E1248]), median PFS was sustained at 13.8 months. The nearly 2-year duration of prior LEN treatment is reflective of pts receiving continuous treatment until PD. In cohort A, hematologic AE rates were lower and median PFS was longer with third-line use, including in the subset of pts with prior PI or BORT exposure, than what has been previously reported for any study in which POM + LoDEX was used in later treatment lines. These results support the benefit of third-line POM + LoDEX immediately following LEN + PI-based therapy in pts with RRMM. Disclosures Siegel: Celgene, Takeda, Amgen Inc, Novartis and BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Schiller: bluebird bio: Research Funding; mateon therapeutics: Research Funding. Kaya: Millennium, Novartis, Celgene, Onyx, Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sebag: Celgene, Janssen: Consultancy. Malek: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Talamo: Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute: Employment. Mouro: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zafar: Celgene Corporation: Employment. Chung: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Srinivasan: Celgene: Employment. Qian: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agarwal: Celgene Corporation: Employment. Thakurta: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bahlis: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity9s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→