Usage of Mobile Phone Applications and Its Impact on Teaching and Learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study continues studies on the concept of leisure as culture dependent – between tradition and modernity, while focusing on the usage of mobile phone applications and its impact on teaching and learning within a unique population. The study examined the association between having NetSpark on one’s Smartphone and utilization of spare time among students who had or did not have the program installed. The assumption is that when the program is installed students will be more inclined to engage in non-internet related activities, such as spending time with friends, and when the program is not installed they will be more inclined to stay at home and be on the internet and will display less active life of other types. The research population included 120 9th-12th grade female students at a religious high school, aged 14-18. Half were students had had the NetSpark program installed on their phones, and half had not. The study used three questionnaires: a sociodemographic questionnaire, a questionnaire on Smartphone usage patterns, and a questionnaire on utilization of leisure time.The research findings show no association between use of Smartphone applications and of the internet among students in whose phones the program had been installed versus those in whose phones it had not been installed. Secondly, no association was found between utilization of leisure time among students in whose phones the program was installed versus those in whose phones it had not been installed. Furthermore, no difference was found between the total time for which respondents had been using cellular phones of by religiosity, and no difference was found in the joint effect of religiosity + program on the variable daily duration of internet use. Moreover, no difference was found in use of cellular applications between respondents who had / did not have the NetSpark program installed, however use of cellular applications was found to be higher among respondents who ranked themselves less religious than among respondents who ranked themselves as highly religious. Finally, no difference was found in the utilization of leisure time (various activities) among respondents with different levels of religiosity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».