Equitable access to global health internships: a documentary short
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
WHO operates at the centre of the international health system. Its mandate, to promote the health of people worldwide, requires it to build technical and operational skills within the health systems of its 193 member states. For many of these states, particularly those of low income that face growing disease burdens, developing skills in the next generation of public health professionals is imperative. WHO's Internship Programme exists to support this goal. Each year, about 1000 young professionals from across the world join the programme, of whom the majority (61%) work at WHO's headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. However, less than 20% of interns come from developing countries.1Barnett-Vanes A Feng C Jamnejad M Jun J Towards an equitable internship programme at WHO: is reform nigh?.BMJ Glob Health. 2016; 1: e000088Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 2Barnett-Vanes A Kedia T Anyangwe S Equitable access to global health internships, insights and strategies at WHO headquarters.Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 2: e257-e259Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (3) Google Scholar, 3WHO Human resources: annual report and Workforce data tables, as at 31 December 2016.in: 70th World Health Assembly. 2017http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA70/A70_45-en.pdfGoogle Scholar This imbalance in member state participation has two principal causes: an absence of financial support for interns, which precludes the participation of many from low-income and middle-income countries; and an ad-hoc recruitment process that favours candidates with connections in well-established academic institutions, typically in high-income countries. The result is a missed opportunity for WHO and inadvertently undermines its own objectives on human resources for health. Accordingly, a group of former WHO interns supported by a group of non-governmental organisations ran a public fundraising campaign to financially support two young public health professionals from low-income and middle-income countries to intern at WHO's headquarters. Selected for scholarships by an independent panel of global health experts, these two interns travelled from Uganda and Tunisia for 3-month internships in Geneva. Filmmakers in Uganda, Tunisia, Switzerland, and the UK produced a short film to document the interns' experiences and explore the wider implications of their journey. In both cases, the internship served as a launch pad for their careers in public health. These issues have been discussed at meetings of WHO's governing bodies, including the 2016 and 2017 Executive Board meetings and World Health Assemblies,1Barnett-Vanes A Feng C Jamnejad M Jun J Towards an equitable internship programme at WHO: is reform nigh?.BMJ Glob Health. 2016; 1: e000088Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar, 4WHO Provisional summary of the third meeting—A70/B/PSR/3. 2017http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA70-A-B-PSR/A70_BPSR3-en.pdfGoogle Scholar but with little progress to date. With the election of a new WHO Director-General, the next phase of WHO reform beckons and with it a chance to bring equity to its internship programme. We applaud his recognition that talent is universal and urge the Director-General to seize this opportunity, together with member states, to lead comprehensive and lasting reform. In this documentary, we move beyond statistics and follow the journey of two interns, whose stories speak for a generation full of potential and whom WHO has both a responsibility and direct interest in nurturing.5Owaseye O Perspectives of a Nigerian former WHO-HQ intern.Pan Afr Med J. 2015; 22: 42Crossref PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar AB-V reports grants and non-financial support from Royal Society of Arts and grants from Public Health Research Centre at Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. RY reports personal fees from Child Family Health International. TK reports grants and non-financial support from Child Family Health International, grants and non-financial support from Royal Society of Arts. TR reports grants from Dutch Government of Foreign Affairs (MinBuza), grants from British Government (DFID), grants from Open Society Foundation (OSF), grants from European Union (CHAFEA), grants from Helmsley Trust, and grants from Camino Foundation. All other authors declare no competing interests. TK and AB-V contributed equally.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».