MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2782857811

Rabbit Showmanship Guidebook

2017· article· en· W2782857811 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigitalCommons - CalPoly (California State Polytechnic University) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueRabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRabbit (cipher)Computer scienceComputer security
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rabbit Showmanship Guidebook A Senior Project Presented to The Faculty of the Agricultural Education and Communication Department California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Science By © Mitchell Liwanag June 2017 Introduction: Every year 4-H, FFA, and Independent exhibitors compete in rabbit showmanship at hundreds of county and state fairs as well as rabbit shows. It is the author’s opinion with the proper guidance, showmanship can be simple and easy to learn. However, without the help of someone knowledgeable, showmanship is complicated. By creating a showmanship guide new leaders and exhibitors will have a better understanding of rabbit showmanship and be more competitive at shows. This guidebook was created in hopes of building a foundation and having all resources included for leaders and exhibitors to use when learning and teaching showmanship. This guidebook will help better the quality of participants and overall knowledge of the contest with both leaders and exhibitors. It will be made available online to 4-H and FFA programs. Background: Showmanship is an important skill that can be used to teach youth about their animals and the judging process (ARBA, 2107). The American Rabbit Breeders Association (ARBA) is an organization dedicated to the promotion, development, and improvement of the domestic rabbit and cavy. With over 23,000 members throughout the United States, Canada, and abroad, the association continues to grow (ARBA 2017). The only resource ARBA offers directly for showmanship is the official score sheet (ARBA 2017). The scoresheet shows the steps and are the basics of what the rabbit the exhibitor needs to cover as well as key words to share as prompted. The scorecard also shows the breakdown of points per step (ARBA, 2011). Judges are all expected to use the Standard of Perfection while judging showmanship. Exhibitors are also expected to be familiar with it. The Standard of Perfection has the breed standards for all recognized breeds of rabbits as well as other information including: a glossary of terms and diseases, fur types, body types and eye color (Standard, 2016). Texas 4-H has guidelines available online regarding showmanship and how to perform it (Guidelines, 2016). However, the author feels information is missing and is basically a summary of the ARBA scorecard. Ohio 4-H has information about showmanship, handling, and care of the rabbit. However, the author feels the information is inaccurate and does not explain how to complete each step. No pictures are involved in Ohio’s materials (Ohio 4-H, 2017). Randy Shumaker is currently the ARBA Vice President and travels across the country judging rabbits and rabbit showmanship. Randy’s knowledge of showmanship variations throughout the country will be vital in ensuring the guidebook is as accurate as possible. Keelyn Hanlon is currently an ARBA judge and mentor of many youth. Hanlon herself showed rabbits across the country, competing and winning showmanship at both the state and national level. Tom Berger is the head of the ARBA Youth Committee. His knowledge of the youth of ARBA and programs offered can be utilized. He also will be able to direct the author to anyone else he feels will be of help in the making of the showmanship guidebook. These three judges are known throughout the country for their participation with youth and youth events. Methods: The first step in creating the guidebook is to gather the American Rabbit Breeders Association showmanship scorecard. Next interview multiple showmanship judges on what they think is the greatest challenge participants face while participating in showmanship. Each U.S. region bases its showmanship scorecard on the ARBA standard, however each region has a different way of executing each step. When interviewing judges, select judges that are in the same region for consistency. Use this information to form the focus of the guidebook. After judge input, setup and photograph each step of showmanship as outlined by ARBA. Use a plain background and lock the focus of each picture (Kodak, 2017). Next using a program such as InDesign or Microsoft Word, create the guidebook, including pictures of each step, the reasons behind each step, sample questions, and tips from the judges that were interviewed. Results: A guidebook was created that outlined and explains the steps of showmanship. The guidebook was created in a Google Document for easier viewing while editing and sharing. The guidebook should be downloaded into a PDF document and printed out so that it can be bound or shared online however the owner of the guidebook wishes. The guidebook includes sample showmanship questions as well as pictures of each step so that anyone reading will be able to teach themselves how to perform each step. The ARBA showmanship scorecard was used heavily to ensure each step was completed and explained correctly. Information on proper handling of rabbits was also included in the guidebook since it is crucial for the safety of the handlers and rabbits. After reading the guidebook, readers should have an understanding of showmanship and the reason for doing each step. Conclusion: Rabbit showmanship is constantly evolving. Therefore, the ARBA Youth Committee should keep this guidebook up to date and look to revise any of it every three years so future participants can have access to the most up to date and correct information. If this project were to be repeated, interviews and research should be done with judges throughout all regions of the country so the guidebook can better represent a nationwide view of rabbit showmanship, as well as identify the regional differences in the routine. The author of the guidebook included personal advice on what helped him be competitive in showmanship and included pictures of himself performing showmanship. The author included pictures of steps being performed in different ways so that the readers of the guidebook can pick which method of performing certain steps they prefer and can use to refine their rabbit showmanship routine. In doing so, the author met all objectives of developing a rabbit showmanship guide. Citations 4-H Rabbit Showmanship. (n.d.). Retrieved May 8, 2016, from http://www.ohio4h.org/sites/ohio4h/files/imce/animal_science/4-HRabbitShowmanship.pdf Berger, Tom. “Showmanship.” Online interview. 1 Mar 2017. Design, Rio Paso Web. “American Rabbit Breeders Association, Inc” American Rabbit Breeders Association, Inc N.p., n.d. Web. 07 June 2017. Guidelines For The Texas 4-H Rabbit Showmanship. (n.d.). Retrieved May 8, 2016, from https://4-h.ca.uky.edu/sites/4-h.ca.uky.edu/files/rabbit_showmanship_guide_for_ky.pdf Hanlon, Keelyn. “Showmanship.” Online interview. 1 Mar 2017. Rabbit Showmanship. (2011, May 4). Retrieved May 8, 2016, from https://www.arba.net/PDFs/Showmanship.pdf Standard Of Perfection (2016-2020). (n.d.). American Rabbit Breeders Association. Shumaker, Randy. “Showmanship.” Online interview. 1 Mar. 2017.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,836
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle