Tuibur: tobacco in a bottle—commercial production of tobacco smoke‐saturated aqueous concentrate
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Certain forms of tobacco that are relatively unknown in the scientific community have been used widely for centuries. One such form is tuibur 1, 2, a tobacco smoke-saturated aqueous concentrate prevalent in north-eastern India 3. The highest prevalence of tobacco consumption in India occurs in the northeastern province of Mizoram 4, 5, where the Aizawl District also leads the incidence rates of all tobacco-related cancers in the country 6. Yet references to tuibur use are rare and restricted mainly to local publications 3, 7-12. This commentary aims to raise awareness and stimulate research on this tobacco product about which little is known. We describe its production and distribution with the support of photographs to contextualize this knowledge for readers. Historically, women smoked tobacco in waterpipes made of bamboo (Fig. 1), and would offer the leftover tobacco-infused water from the pipe reservoir to their husband 10. Users keep a small amount (5–10 ml) of liquid in the mouth for many minutes several times throughout the day; some may also swallow a portion of the liquid 13. Increased demand for the product moved production from households to makeshift sheds located near natural water sources (Fig. 2). Indeed, concern over its environmental and health impact may help to explain why tuibur is produced in small batches in artisanal facilities 14-16. The production of a fresh batch of tuibur starts early in the morning. First, water is alkalized by being filtered through tobacco ash from the previous batch (Supporting information, Fig. S1). Alkaline pH maintains an unprotonated form of nicotine that is absorbed easily through the oral mucosa 1. This solution is then poured into the lower chamber of a device (Fig. 3) with a rudimentary water educator (aspirator). A pipe is inserted into this chamber with one end just below the water level, and sealed with mud (Fig. 3). The upper half of the device, the combustion chamber, is connected to the lower chamber through a filtered opening at the bottom. Dried tobacco stalk is placed in the combustion chamber and set to smoulder (Supporting information, Fig. S2). Subsequently, this chamber is sealed with wet tobacco ash. The pressure from a stream of water creates a suction in the smaller pipes, which ensures that tobacco smoke bubbles through the alkaline solution. The process is complete when the tobacco stalk has burned completely, which takes anywhere from 12 hours to 3 days, depending upon the amount of tobacco stalk used. ‘Crude’ tuibur from the lower chamber is then pipetted out and filtered again through tobacco ash (Supporting information, Figure S3). This ‘commercial’ grade tuibur is sold in bulk to distributors, who bottle and sell it in local markets with a statutory pictorial warning. Tuibur consumption is highly addictive, and deeply entrenched in the culture of the region. In addition, the rudimentary character of tuibur production has potential environmental consequences, which may compound health impacts. At a time when tobacco control is a global priority, we argue that this deleterious habit merits more research attention. None. We are grateful to the producers of Tuibur who welcomed our visit to their production site. We also thank Drs G. Castonguay and A. Levine for providing helpful comments on the manuscript. B. Nicolau holds a Canada Research Chair in Life Course Oral Epidemiology and received a Shastri Scholar Travel Subsidy Grant to support her visit to University of Mizoram. Figure S1 Preparation of feedstock for tuibur. S1a: Filtering water through tobacco ash to make it alkaline; S1b: filling the alkaline feedstock to lower compartment; S1c: inlet pipe for tobacco smoke to lower chamber. Figure S2 S2a and S2b: Dried tobacco stalk loaded into the upper chamber; S2c: burning of tobacco stalk in the upper chamber. Figure S3 S3a: Pipetting out of tuibur from lower chamber; S3b: filling containers with tuibur for transportation; S3c: tuibur sold in local market. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».