MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2785221696 · doi:10.22215/etd/2017-12206

Serving Resistance on the Menu: The Cultural Politics of Filipino Cuisine in Winnipeg and Ottawa

2017· dissertation· en· W2785221696 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Gazelle Manuel

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueCulinary Culture and Tourism
Établissements canadiensCarleton University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrideResistance (ecology)PoliticsMainstreamGender studiesColonialismIdentity (music)SociologyInvisibilityRacismCultural assimilationRepresentation (politics)Political scienceMedia studiesArtAestheticsLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This thesis explores the cultural politics of Filipino cuisine in Canada.Filipinos are the fourth largest visible minority group in Canada yet their cuisine remains underrepresented in the Canadian foodscape compared to other Asian groups.By comparing Winnipeg and Ottawa's contexts, I explore how Filipino cuisine entrepreneurs "do" Filipino cuisine through their establishments.I also examine potential explanations as to why Filipino cuisine is not mainstream.The findings suggest that the underrepresentation of Filipino cuisine can be attributed to structural barriers (colonialism and institutional racism) and the low incidence of Filipino entrepreneurship.Through culinary entrepreneurial practices, Filipino cuisine entrepreneurs engage in a politics of resistance and identity work.For some, the production of Filipino cuisine is implicated in the struggle against cultural assimilation.For others, it is an act of cultural pride and a politics of representation that seeks to disrupt the "hypervisibility" and "invisibility" of Filipino-Canadians and Filipino cuisine.chance.Through his approachable teaching style, I fell in love with sociology, so much so that I decided to take his class as a student the following year.As a teacher, he goes above and beyond for his students and if it were not for his help, I would have not mustered the courage and selfconfidence to apply to graduate school.To Curt, as always, I thank you for being such a beacon of support even until now.I also thank you for being such a great role model.I can only hope one day I can inspire my students like you have for me and for countless others.I would like to thank my peers and classmates for their lending ears and for helping me brainstorm ideas on my thesis.Your feedback, critiques, and second opinions were all very helpful and kept me in check.I would especially like to thank Marie Coligado for being so patient with me and providing critical insights and feedback during the thesis writing process.Marie was especially helpful with our discussions regarding the differences and similarities between the Filipino communities in Winnipeg and Ottawa.A very large thanks to my friends in Winnipeg and in other parts of the world.Since undergrad, you all encouraged me to pursue sociological studies on critical race and ethnicity studies and food.Throughout the years, my friends would send me articles relating to my research interests through e-mail or social media.I like to extend my gratitude to Joey Felizardo who accompanied me during my participant observations to Filipino restaurants and introduced me to other Filipino restaurants in the city.I would also like to thank Palak Dhiman for her support and attending my thesis defence.Your presence definitely served as a calming effect.Thank you to all my friends who listened to me as I rambled on about my dissertation.Thanks for believing in me and snapping me out of my moments of self-doubt and impostor syndrome.To my mom, dad, and my brotherthank you for being such a great family unit and for always supporting my studies.I am grateful to my mom and dad for their sacrifices so they could provide for me and Matthew.My mom and dad parented me in a way that fostered my independence and critical thinking, even if it was not easy, and even if their parenting styles were criticized by family members and others.I thank my mom and dad for never giving up on me and for letting me pursue my dreams freely.Mom and dad, your influence has shaped me as a sociologist today.Mom, thank you for

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,107
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,779

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0370,011
Communication savante0,0080,001
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetCulinary Culture and Tourism→Travaux en français237 207→