MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2785883417 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11036

A Cultural Approach to Foreign Policy Analysis: The Role of Political Ideologies in Shaping Israeli Policy Toward the Peace Process

2015· dissertation· en· W2785883417 sur OpenAlexaff
Hamed Mousavi

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensCarleton University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIdeologyOpposition (politics)Political economyPoliticsPolitical scienceZionismForeign policyPeace movementLawSociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Why was Israeli policy toward the peace process in the 1990s conflicted, inconsistent and even erratic?This study suggests that in order to understand Israeli foreign policy, we must analyze the country's domestic political movements.The dissertation takes a theoretically informed approach, which seeks to 'bring back' ideology to cultural frameworks of foreign policy analysis, to examine the Israeli case.The study argues that the political movements within Israel interpreted and reacted differently to the regional and global developments of the 1980s and early 1990s.These various perspectives were due to the fact that the ideologies of these movements were constructed in relation and opposition to each other, and as a result they differed on what it meant to be "Israeli," as well as what they considered the "national interest."Both the rise and the fall of the peace process should be seen as part of a larger ideological struggle between the Labor movement on the one hand and the religious and revisionist Zionist movements on the other, each of which sought to redefine Zionism and Israel in its own image and according to its own ideology.Israel's drive to peace in the early nineteen nineties was the result of the interaction between a new liberal Zionist ideology of the Labor movement and regional and global developments.In contrast the religious Zionist movement saw the peace process as part of the "Hellenization" of Israeli state and society and the abortion of the "divine redemptive process."The revisionists also opposed the peace process based on the movement's ideology that portrayed Israel as an isolated and vulnerable nation, which could only rely on military power, rather than iii political agreements, against an "anti-Semitic" and hostile gentile world.The shifts in Israeli foreign policy in the nineteen nineties were thus the result of the confrontation between these contrasting worldviews.subsequent years, the country's policy largely went back to its former prenegotiation position.These developments have also negatively affected the country's relationship with the United States, making it "dysfunctional" in the last few years according to one senior American diplomat.2 IR scholars have offered various explanations for the puzzling changes in Israeli foreign policy.Jonathan Rynhold argues that a cultural shift towards postmaterialism that led to the rise of a new generation of Israeli Left was the primary driving factor in the country's decision to pursue a negotiated settlement.This rise resulted in the success of the Labor party in the 1992 elections, giving the new Left an opportunity to change the country's foreign policy.Rynhold explains the collapse of the peace process as the effects of "domestic and international constraints," which eventually led to the marginalization of the liberal Left, 3 although a sufficient description of these constraints is not provided.Arie Kacowicz explains the rise and fall of the peace process by examining the conflicting narratives of both the Israelis and the Palestinians.Narratives shape identities and norms, creating self-fulfilling prophecies that provide a moral justification to the actions of each party.From the Israeli side the narrative was that territory and political authority was being relinquished to the Palestinians in exchange for security, however with the onset of suicide 2 See Lee Smith, "Have Obama and Bibi Made Up?," December 5, 2012, http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/118288/have-obama-and-bibi-made-up. 3 See Jonathan Rynhold, "Cultural Shift and Foreign Policy Change: Israel and the Making of the Oslo Accords," Cooperation and Conflict 42 (2007): 419-40.Palmer, 25 Schultz, 26 London et al 27 and Fordham.28 Another group of scholars, including Delaet and Scott, 29 Bartels, 30 McCormick and Wittkopf, 31 study the legislative voting behavior of politicians.A third group of scholars, including Holsti, 32 Wittkopf, 33 Holsti and Rosenau, 34 rely on elite surveys.Finally some 25

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,038
Communication savante0,0140,007
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,075
Tête enseignante GPT0,395
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesTravaux en français237 207