MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2787726733 · doi:10.20381/ruor-21521

The Self and the Other: An Attachment Perspective for Uncovering Dyadic Patterns of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Distress

2018· dissertation· en· W2787726733 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josée Fitzpatrick

Notice bibliographique

RevueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIntrapersonal communicationPerspective (graphical)Interpersonal communicationPsychologyDistressInterpersonal relationshipSocial psychologyPsychotherapistComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Psychosocial research is increasingly focused on attachment, specifically on the potential mechanisms associating attachment with psychological functioning (Cassidy & Shaver, 2016). In past decades, attachment research has sought to better understand the development of individual psychological distress as well as relationship distress, given its major impacts on the overall well-being of individuals. It is worth noting that researchers have identified specific intrapersonal and interpersonal factors that are important variables to consider in the link between attachment and both individual distress and relationship dissatisfaction (Ensel & Lin, 1991; Hobfoll, 2002). However, little attention has been paid to investigating these mechanisms using a dyadic approach in order to gain a better understanding of reciprocal impacts within couple relationships. Since dyadic research methods have not been commonly utilized for understanding distress within an attachment framework, this has limited our understanding of the effect partners have on one another. Consequentially, the importance of dyadic effects has possibly been minimized in research. The present thesis, composed of two main studies, aims to verify if self-esteem and dyadic trust help explain the link between insecure romantic attachment (attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance) and individual and relationship distress using actor-partner interdependence mediation model analyses. The studies presented in the present thesis were approved by the University of Ottawa’s Research Ethics Board. The first study was comprised of two separate studies, both of which aimed to assess a conceptual model examining whether low self-esteem mediates the relationship between insecure romantic attachment and high psychological distress using two independent samples within unique periods in adulthood: a young adult student sample and a sample of couples in later adulthood who are parents. The first sample consisted of 485 Canadian university students (414 females; M age= 19.83 years) who were all in a couple relationship for at least 6 months at the time of participation. Bootstrapping procedures were utilized to assess indirect effects, and results supported our hypothesized model. As such, low self-esteem mediated the relationship between insecure romantic attachment and high psychological distress for both men and women. The second sample consisted of 35 couples in later adulthood who are parents (70 individuals, M age = 41.04 years). An actor-partner interdependence meditational model was tested to assess actor, partner, and indirect effects. Results showed that low male self-esteem partially mediated the relationship between male attachment anxiety and high male psychological distress. Similarly, low female self-esteem partially mediated the relationship between female attachment anxiety and high female psychological distress. Interestingly, high female self-esteem partially mediated the relationship between female attachment avoidance and low female psychological distress. Unexpectedly, low self-esteem in women fully mediated the relationship between female attachment anxiety and low male psychological distress. In the same vein, high self-esteem in women partially mediated the relationship between female attachment avoidance and high male psychological distress. The second study investigated whether low dyadic trust mediates the relationship between insecure romantic attachment and low relationship satisfaction in a third independent community sample of heterosexual couples engaged in a relationship for at least 12 months. The sample consisted of 199 Canadian couples ranging from young to later adulthood (398 individuals, M age = 31.02 years). An actor-partner meditational model was used to test hypothesized relations. Results revealed that lower dyadic trust partially explained the relationship between both male and female attachment avoidance and male attachment anxiety with lower relationship satisfaction. Findings from these studies have major implications for both clinical applications as well as future research directions. Specifically, gaining a better understanding of the role of romantic partners in the overall well-being of individuals can confirm as well as guide couple therapy conceptualizations and techniques. Uncovering existing dyadic patterns can also help support romantic relationship theories and shape future research avenues.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0030,004
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,404
Écart entre enseignants0,373 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→Même sujetAttachment and Relationship Dynamics→Travaux en français237 207→