The New Governance of Sustainable Food Systems: Shared Insights from Four Rural Communities in Canada and the EU
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For over half a century, industrial agricultural and food systems have developed to the detriment of rural spaces.Alongside modernization and growth, many local communities have experienced not only economic loss, but a loss of purpose and identity as well.As one response to these changes, sustainable local food systems (SLFS) initiatives are being pursued by a growing number of communities.Their belief is that an alternative paradigm based on SLFSs is needed to support vibrant rural livelihoods: by challenging unequal power relationships between food system actors, by repairing the rift between human and natural environments, or simply by breathing new socio-economic life into their declining communities.This dissertation explores the governance mechanisms being developed between civil society, the state, and private sector actors to support SLFS initiatives.It aims to show not only what initiatives are developed, but how these alternatives are introduced and sustained.Building on governance theory and drawing from critical political economy approaches, this work argues that collaborative and reflexive governance approaches are best positioned to enable SLFS development.To support this claim, I describe and analyze cases of SLFS initiatives pursued within four rural communities: Todmorden, UK, Wolfville, Nova Scotia and North Saanich, British Columbia in Canada, and Correns, France.These case studies highlight six categories of governance that ultimately demonstrate low to highly collaborative and iii reflexive SLFS initiatives.Outlining types of governance and how they play out in practice allows us to better understand the opportunities and challenges inherent to different governance strategies and their ability to support SLFSs.Grounded in both field observations and in-depth and semi-structured interviews with community members, this work also aims to give voice to actors often marginalized in dominant food system processes.An analysis of the case studies highlights the need for 1) strong social capital within a community; 2) a whole community approach to socio-economic development; 3) a strong role for the state; and 4) genuine multi-actor collaboration, as the foundation for SLFS growth.I conclude by considering sustainable food system research's lingering question on growth and scalability to generate meaningful food system change.I never understood adding such lengthy acknowledgements to a PhD dissertation, until I realized the confidence and determination required to complete one.I feel such a great depth of gratitude towards those who helped me through this 6+ year process.Thank you, to my family for your endless support.Papa, for your boundless optimism and for instilling in me the belief in the power of democratic engagement.Mom, for telling me to align my work with my passions and interests.To my sister for always cheering me on, for picking up my late night post-thesis writing calls, and (subconsciously) motivating me to take on research that has real-world application.And thank you to each of you for altering your food habits based on all the things I have learned!Thank you to Andrew for always believing in me and telling me so frequently, for just making sure I could function, like reminding me to eat
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,034 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».