Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The writers of the diaspora desired to keep alive their traditions in their writings; their basic inspirations are their memories of the past from the motherland. When the immigrants recollect their past, they are not only nostalgic about their memories but about their geographical place which is not only a geographical physical space but also the mentally conjured psychological cultural space. The paper attempts to show how an immigrant writer creates a third space in order to escape from the conflicting situation of choosing the host culture and the native culture as foundation for identity construction. In this new identity, s/he precipitates the past as well as present cultures, showing the diasporic literature as highly vibrant and expressive of the split self of an immigrant.Diaspora is not merely a scattering or dispersion but an experience made up of collective and multiple journeys; an experience determined by who travels, where, how and under what circumstances (Pal et al, 2004, p. 14).Tapas Chakraborty observes that diaspora has two kinds of people: doubly privileged and doubly underprivileged.The doubly underprivileged are those who have lost both homelands as illegal immigrants abroad, have lost izzat. They can't come back without having earned the money, which they lost when they left.The doubly privileged are the people who are 'high placed' in both homeland and the host country (Sharma et al, 2004, p. 55).In the words of Vijaya Mishra, the Indian context has two kinds of diaspora:The old Indian diaspora which is a diaspora of exclusivism, as opposed to new Indian diaspora characterized by mobility, because they created relatively self- contained Tittle Indians' in the colonies (Sharma et al, 2004, p. 82).The Indian diasporic communities have not decreased the intensity of the country but have expanded the borders of India by carrying their cultural baggage to the host culture. People migrate to other countries with many dreams, hopes and aspirations. However, we see many of their hopes and dreams remain fantasies and unrealistic. The question is where do people who have been with the host country for more than a decade stand in the society now? What is their place in that country? This idea can be pursued from Gupta (2003):Today, I live in Canada, having left my home, in Calcutta, not 50, but a little more than 25 years ago. I honestly do not know if I am any more 'independent' today than I would have been had I never left India in 1971. Regardless of whether one considers me a writer or not, I suppose I carry the brand name 'expatriates' (p. 40).An immigrant consciously or subconsciously tries to adapt the host country's culture to prosper and develop in the new culture. Indians who migrated to other countries for economic betterment, now with increased economic strength, play a crucial role in emerging trade, investment, technology and tourism. The people of Indian diaspora carry conflicting contradictory irresolvable cultural codes and pale images of civilization, and when these people are forced to be absorbed into the host country, they manifest maladjustments, because of the social hierarchies and racial, ethnic and cultural differences present within the settler country.Those of first generation Indian diaspora could not assimilate themselves into the host country as they are nostalgic of their homeland and still confined to the principles that nurtured them. The second generation of Indian diaspora gradually got involved with the host country. The third generation of Indian diaspora adapted to the host country. The Indian immigrants formed little Indian colonies in the host countries (such as America, Africa, Canada and UK) and made a noteworthy existence. These little Indian colonies resemble the mother country and in the words of Paranjape (2004),It is not just the homeland that creates diaspora but that diasporas also create the homeland (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».