A30 FIRST YEAR OUTCOMES FROM A PROVINCIALLY FUNDED NON-FIBROSIS RESTRICTED HEPATITIS C TREATMENT PROGRAM IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The availability of novel curative therapies for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has created a unique opportunity to mitigate complications of untreated disease, and improve both clinical programming and treatment access. Between September 2014 and October 2015 local care providers, government, industry, and HCV community groups in Prince Edward Island (PEI) created a province-wide model of care. Core components of the program include: centralized referral, triage, and intake by HCV nurse specialist; HCV treatment specialists; non-fibrosis restricted public access to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy; patient education, follow-up with public and industry-affiliated nursing support; and voluntary patient enrollment into a treatment registry. We evaluated performance of this care model, and both demographic, outcome, and treatment-effectiveness measures for treated patients. Using a prospective observational study design, all chronic HCV referrals received from April 2015 to April 2016 were recorded in the program database. Primary analysis examined program parameters including the time from referral to assessment/treatment, as well as the number of referrals, assessments and treatment initiations. A secondary analysis involved evaluation of treatment effectiveness among all treated patients using intent-to-treat analysis. In the first year of the program, 242 patient referrals were received, 123 patients were seen for intake assessments and 93 initiated on DAAs with prioritization to patients with advanced fibrosis. This is compared to only 4 treatment initiations in the province in the 2 years prior to program implementation. The median time from assessment to treatment initiation was 3 weeks. Overall, 82 of the 84 (97.6%) patients for whom outcome data was available achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) at post-treatment week 12; 1 was lost to follow-up and 1 died following therapy completion from an unrelated event. Detailed demographics and on-treatment data was obtained from 70 patients enrolled in the voluntary treatment registry of whom 27.1% were cirrhotic, 24.3% treatment-experienced, and 82.4% reported on-treatment adverse events. No adverse events were deemed serious or resulted in treatment discontinuation. Initial data from the PEI program demonstrates how comprehensive care programs can be used to facilitate timely access to assessment and initiation of HCV therapy. High SVR rates seen in our real-world cohort were reflective of that seen in registration trials including in difficult to treat patient populations. It is hoped that similar models of care throughout Canada will facilitate broader access to curative HCV therapies, especially in under resourced settings. Health Research Foundation of Innovative Medicines Canada, Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».