CETA: A NEW STAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF RELATIONS BETWEEN CANADA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article is devoted to the problem of the developing the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement. There have been shown the specific features of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement as a contract of a new type between Canada and the European Union. The ambiguous position of European countries in the course of the negotiations on the issue of concluding the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement has been substantiated. It is underlined that after the release of the UK from the EU, the Agreement will be replaced by a new bilateral treaty between Canada and Great Britain. The main goal of creating the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement is defined as liberalization of trade and economic relations. Along with the development of trade in goods, services trade and investment cooperation are identified as the leading areas of cooperation. The institutional structure of the Agreement has been considered. The investment-state mechanism for dispute settlement developed within the framework of the Agreement has beenanalyzed. To resolve investment disputes, the Agreement provides for the establishment of the investment tribunal, the appeals tribunal for investment, the arbitration court. Assessment of possible benefits and costs associated with the participation of EU countries in the Agreement has been given. The prospects for EU cooperation with Canada have been determined. It is emphasized that the Agreement opens new opportunities for European business in the matter of expanding exports to Canada; it creates conditions for qualified personnel from the countries of the European Union to seek work in Canada, because of the recognition of professional qualifications obtained in the member states of the Agreement. Canada's growing interest in expanding cooperation with European states was highlighted. The orientation towards the development of cooperation with Europe is largely explained by "cooling" in relations between the governmental and business circles of Canada and the United States. It has been referred that the American factor should be taken into account when studying the development of economic relations between Canada and the European Union.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».