Effect of seed treatments and soybean cultivars on root rot caused by Fusarium virguliforme
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fusarium virguliforme, the causal agent of sudden death syndrome (SDS), is one of the most important soybean pathogens in the United States and Canada. Cultivar selection, seed treatments and some cultural practices are currently the main management practices for this disease. Fusarium virguliforme is a soilborne pathogen that infects soybean roots early in development (root rot phase), but also leads to the characteristic foliar symptoms (foliar phase) later in the season. Recently, the product fluopyram (ILeVO®, Bayer CropScience) was registered for management of SDS. The research described in this manuscript explains how fluopyram, in combination with cultivar selection, affects the two phases of SDS under field conditions. Two different greenhouse techniques were also evaluated for their ability to quickly and accurately screen seed treatments for efficacy against SDS.\nAll field experiments evaluated two seed treatments: (1) base seed treatment (control), which was prothioconazole + penflufen + metalaxyl (0.019 mg a.i/seed) + metalaxyl (0.02 mg a.i/seed) + clothianidin + Bacillus firmus I-1582 (0.13 mg a.i/seed) and (2) base treatment + fluopyram (0.15 mg a.i/seed). For the Roland, IA and Muscatine, IA locations in 2015, a third seed treatment was included; (3) base treatment + fluopyram (0.075 mg a.i./seed). All three seed treatments were included in all of the 2016 locations. Three soybean cultivars, categorized as susceptible, moderately resistant or resistant, were planted at each location. Fluopyram significantly reduced root rot at 7 of the 10 locations and foliar symptoms at 5 of the 9 locations where foliar symptoms occurred. Yield was significantly increased by fluopyram at 5 of the 10 locations. Our findings suggest that yields could be reduced by the root rot phase and should be managed in addition to the foliar phase of SDS.\nTwo greenhouse techniques: (1) soil-incorporated technique and (2) layer technique used the aforementioned seed treatments in the greenhouse. Neither technique consistently differentiated between treatments for foliar symptoms. However, both experiments showed approximately 20% reductions in root rot severity between the base seed treatment and both rates of fluopyram. Further work is needed to identify a controlled experiment in the greenhouse for evaluating seed treatments for both phases of SDS.\nOur findings suggest that at locations with known SDS history in years with favorable weather for the F. virguliforme pathogen, both phases of SDS can cause significant yield loss. The use of fluopyram as a seed treatment, along with resistant cultivars can protect soybean yields from both phases of SDS. However, more work is needed to identify an integrated management plan for both the root rot and foliar phases of SDS
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».