AB048. Pre-saccadic attentional facilitation is influenced by irrelevant post-saccadic changes
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Many studies have shown that attention is shifted toward the goal of the upcoming saccade. It has been suggested that the purpose of this attentional shift is to aid in trans-saccadic integration by acting as a ‘pointer’ (Cavanagh, Hunt, Afraz & Rolfs, 2010) for remembering, processing and updating objects across saccadic eye movements (Rolfs, Jonikaitis, Deubel & Cavanagh, 2011). We tested this hypothesis that pre-saccadic attentional facilitation acts as a pointer for trans-saccadic integration by investigating how irrelevant post-saccadic changes influenced pre-saccadic attentional discrimination. On one hand, if pre-saccadic attentional facilitation is an independent process involved only in enhancing peripheral information before the saccade, then manipulating visual information (absence or shift) after the saccade should have no influence on discrimination. On the other hand, if pre-saccadic attentional facilitation is involved in trans-saccadic integration, changes in visual information should influence discrimination of the pre-saccadic information. Methods: We tested different conditions involving different post-saccadic changes. In the baseline condition, participants made a saccade at the appearance of an arrow and discriminated a symbol (DS) that was presented briefly before the saccade at one of six peripheral locations. The symbol was masked thereafter with a figure 8, which remained till the end of the trial. Importantly, the DS was always presented while participants were fixating at center, and only the figure 8 was present at the end of the saccade. Participants were instructed to make the saccade then report the identity of the DS (4AFC). We then tested how blanking post-saccadic information [blanking of the saccade goal (SG) location, DSOff condition; of the entire visual scene including or excluding the SG location, AllOff and DSOnly conditions] and how displacement of the figure 8s after the saccade would affect performance. Results: We observed that discrimination performance was significantly lower when the SG location disappeared during the saccade and was no longer present when the saccade was completed (DSOff, –6.9%). This decrease in performance cannot be attributed to changes in the visual scene that may have drawn attention, as this was the case for all conditions; performance was not different when the entire visual scene was blanked (AllOff, –0.0%) or when only the DS remained (DSOnly, –1.6%). We also found that the performance decreased as a function of the displacement of the figure 8 from the SG location, particularly if it was displaced outside of the saccade landing zone. Conclusions: Based on these pattern of results, we suggest that pre-saccadic attentional facilitation is indeed involved in trans-saccadic integration by acting as a location marker or pointer. The lack of a visual target at the saccade goal, even if it is irrelevant to the pre-saccadic discrimination task, disrupted performance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».