A227 UNDERSTANDING ACCESS TO IBD SPECIALTY CARE IN NOVA SCOTIA THROUGH THE PATIENT LENSE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a chronic immune-mediated disease with significant societal burden. The highest age and sex-adjusted standardized incidence and prevalence estimates of IBD have been observed in Canada, with Nova Scotia exhibiting the highest rates in the country. Despite this burden, Canadians living with IBD often face access barriers when seeking gastroenterology specialty care. To examine IBD care access through the patient perspective in order to identify barriers and facilitators for equitable and efficient access to gastroenterology specialty care in Nova Scotia. A peer-reviewed and patient-piloted questionnaire was developed through extensive consultation with clinicians, epidemiologists, nurse practitioners (NP), and patients. Questionnaires were developed using evidence-based principles and included demographic, disease, referral structure, and referral process-related questions. The survey was administered using a stratified, random sampling approach to ensure geographic representation. Questionnaires were completed by patients presenting to the Nova Scotia Collaborative IBD Program following their appointment with a luminal GI clinician or IBD NP. As of October 2017, 33 respondents completed questionnaires (sample target: 372). Twenty patients were female (20/33, 61%), mean age of 44 years (SD=16.7, range 19–76 years). Crohn’s disease was the most common diagnosis (20/33, 61%), with patients experiencing symptoms between 1 month and 8 years before being seen by a specialist. The majority of patients (25/33, 76%) reported using healthcare services to manage their IBD while waiting to see a specialist, including emergency room services and walk-in clinics. Approximately 20% (7/33) of patients reported that most or all of their appointments were located outside of their community, with a mean wait time of 3–6 months for a specialist appointment. Patients identified long wait times (17/33, 52%), limited resources (e.g. lack of a GI specialist in their community) (10/33, 30%), and poor communication (e.g. lack of communication between patient, referring physician, and specialist) (7/33, 21%) as major access barriers. The top three recommendations by patients for improved access to care were being able to contact the specialists’ office to notify them of worsening symptoms (15/33, 46%), receiving direct communication about wait times and appointments (14/33, 42%), and ability to self-refer (9/33, 27%). This is one of the first studies conducted which examines access to gastroenterology IBD specialty care from the patient perspective. Our findings show clear patient-perceived barriers to accessing IBD specialist care in Nova Scotia with long wait times despite a high medical need. Survey administration is ongoing. CIHRNova Scotia Health Authority Research Fund
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».