"""We are the blue berets:"" problematizing peacekeeping in postwar Canada"
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
"This dissertation highlights some of the innumerable ways that participation in UN peacekeeping efforts became one of the central symbols employed in Canadian self-identification from 1956 to 1997. What emerges is a web encompassing forty or so years of continuity and change in how messages about peacekeeping and Canada were produced, disseminated, and received by Canadians. The strands which comprise this web are: the political rhetoric of peacekeeping, the use of peacekeeping in high school textbooks, National Film Board [NFB] documentaries about peacekeeping, newspaper coverage of peacekeeping, and editorial cartoons about peacekeeping. \n\nPeacekeeping's growing adoption as a national symbol in Canada depended considerably on writers' and artists' abilities to discuss more than the successes and failures of individual missions or peacekeeping as a governmental policy. UN peacekeeping operations have not been universally successful; Canadians, therefore, did not become attached to peacekeeping through the actual achievements of their peacekeepers. Rather, what largely determined the content of each medium's messages were persistent discussions which foregrounded Canada's participation in peacekeeping operations, as well as the existence of three parallel discourses about peacekeeping which referred to the past, the present, or the future for audiences. The nostalgic and progressive discourses encouraged Canadians to see peacekeeping as a symbolic activity. The words and images associated with these temporal understandings of peacekeeping helped blunt the impact of any criticisms which were made using functional criteria in the present. \n\nWhile internationalist in emphasis, peacekeeping was seen through domestic frames far more often. Individual missions mattered less than the idea of peacekeeping and Canada's part in its perpetuation. When missions went awry, the impact on Canada was discussed far more than the effects on the host nations. The domestic production and reception of messages about peacekeeping was therefore influenced by internationalism, but remained centred on the Canadian experience of peacekeeping. This domestic emphasis problematizes the Canadian attachment to peacekeeping while also providing answers to why so many Canadians strongly associate with peacekeeping. Or feel, as Stompin' Tom Connors put it, that "we are the Blue Berets.""
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».