A306 SIBO AND ASSOCIATION WITH IBD ACTIVITY.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
SIBO is when there is an excess number of bacteria in the small intestine or when bacteria normally found in the colon are found in the small intestine. Excessive infiltration by bacteria into the small intestine is usually prevented by a number of mechanisms including an intact ileocaecal valve, gastric and bile acid secretion, antegrade peristalsis, digestion by proteolytic enzymes, IgA production and an intact mucus layer. Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease are believed to be at increased risk of developing SIBO. An excess number of bacteria in the small intestine can provoke diarrhoea, cause gas, and lead to malabsorption of micronutrients. Medical and surgical therapy for IBD is expensive and we may be over-treating patients with symptoms who actually have SIBO. There has only been a handful of published studies looking at the prevalence of SIBO in IBD, with no studies looking at disease activity or other clinical features. The purpose of this pilot study is to estimate the prevalence of SIBO in IBD and to see if there are any clinical features associated with an increased likelihood of SIBO in CD or UC. Participants are asked to do a SIBO breath test at St Joseph’s Hospital. Two days prior to the test, participants are asked to eat a low fermentable carbohydrate diet, and to fast 10 hours prior. Participants provide a baseline breath sample. Then, after consuming the glucose drink (75g in 200ml water), breath samples are taken every 15 minutes for 2 hours. Concentration of hydrogen and methane in the breath are measured on the Quintron machine. Participants are deemed to have SIBO if they have an increase in either hydrogen or methane of 12 parts per million from the baseline level. We use previous information from the patients chart as well as a history from the patient to obtain data for disease history and severity using MAYO for UC and CDAI for CD. Fresh fecal and urine samples are collected in DNA/RNA free bags and sterile containers and stored at -80C. A total of 13 patients were recruited to participate in this pilot study. 7 patients conducted the SIBO testing, 4 with CD and 3 with UC. Of those tested, 1 was positive for SIBO and 1 had a sustantially elevated baseline hydrogen level. Both of these patients were CD patients with a previous history of small bowel resection. They were 2 of 4 with previous surgeries, the other two having an end iliostomy. These two patients also had lower CDAI scores of the 4 with CD. This study aligns with previous studies and shows that patients with IBD have an increased risk of SIBO. It also shows that previous small bowel resection appears to be a risk factor for SIBO. Disease activity does not seem to play a role, but further studies need to be done. With a look into the stool and urine samples collected on these patients, we hope to be able to identify particular microbiota that may be associated with SIBO in IBD. None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».