MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2791170778 · doi:10.2118/0817-0032-jpt

Renewable Opportunities: The Growing Range of Renewable Options for Oil and Gas

2017· article· en· W2791170778 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Rassenfoss, Trent Jacobs

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMarine and Offshore Engineering Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOffshore wind powerRenewable energyPetroleum industrySubmarine pipelineFossil fuelEngineeringWork (physics)BusinessNatural resource economicsPetroleum engineeringWind powerEconomicsWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Growing Range of Renewable Options for Oil and Gas Stephen Rassenfoss, JPT Emerging Technology Senior Editor Trent Jacobs, JPT Digital Editor The offshore renewable energy business shares a lot of similarities with offshore oil and gas development. The designs of the structures are similar, as are the work vessels needed to build and maintain them. Corroding steel is a shared obsession, as is the soil analysis needed to be sure a structure is on sound footing. All of which could create opportunities for idle experts in offshore oil and gas construction and services. “With the expertise of the oil and gas industry, we can tackle a lot of challenges,” said Alana Duerr, offshore wind lead for the US Department of Energy, during a speech at the 2017 Offshore Technology Conference where she asked for technical assistance to spark US offshore wind development. The speech promoted the US offshore wind sector, which shares an unfortunate similarity to offshore exploration and production: it is not cost-competitive with onshore producers, whether it is wind, solar, or unconventional oil and gas. That is the problem in most parts of the world with the exception of the North Sea, where there has been aggressive development with support from governments concerned about carbon emissions. “The offshore wind sector has overtaken North Sea oil and gas,” said Lee Grace, senior naval architect at Vard Marine, during a presentation at OTC about a workboat the company developed for that market, which looks similar to those used in oil and gas (OTC 27772). But given the deep slump in the offshore oil sector, there is reason for oil and gas contractors to consider their options. Off the US east coast there is a large opportunity, with strong, steady winds near some of the biggest energy markets in the country. But the price is more than double the cost of onshore wind generation or gas-powered plants. Waves are Full of Energy, Sometimes Destructively So Stephen Rassenfoss, JPT Emerging Technology Senior Editor Ocean waves are potential sources of energy that are powerful, often more readily available than wind and solar, and closer to population centers along coastlines. But so far it is mostly just potential. Using the unpredictable changes of the ocean to drive the turbines of a largescale floating generator is a problem, but hardly the only one that has yet to be solved. “Wave energy current devices you put in the ocean need to be cost-effective and need to compete with what the other options are,” said Donald Gehring, president of Marine Energy Co. The structural engineer, who has long made his living advising companies active in offshore oil and gas development, has developed a fascination with the challenges posed by wave power and has a design he thinks can reach the break-even level. Heavy-Oil Technology May Be a Perfect Fit for Geothermal Power Trent Jacobs, JPT Digital Editor While the economic future of greenfield heavy-oil projects is in serious doubt these days, one prominent applied research group in Canada said that some of the technologies involved with heavy oil have the potential to be used around the world. The catch is that the technologies— specifically those involved in steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD)— would be primarily used not to produce oil, but geothermal power. “We believe that Alberta has been doing geothermal backwards for 30 years,” said Brian Wagg, director of business development at Edmonton-based C-FER Technologies, who explained how SAGD centers on pushing large volumes of steam into the ground via injection well where it heats viscous oil to a point at which it flows freely into a producing well. The concept that C-FER is promoting is termed an enhanced geothermal system and involves sending cool water down an injector well to become heated by moving through a nonhydrocarbon-bearing rock formation. Solar EOR Firm Looks To Heat Up the Competition Trent Jacobs, JPT Digital Editor German startup Solarlite is trying to do two things for oil companies: make steam, and make it cheap. Founded in 2004, the firm specializes in manufacturing concentrated solar power (CSP) systems that have mainly been used for small-scale electricity generation. But that application is being squeezed by another solar energy technology, photovoltaics (PVs), and so the company is now looking at enhanced oil recovery (EOR) for its future business. “The price of PVs has declined so dramatically that, at least for power generation, people question if CSP can actually survive,” said Steven Geiger, director of business development for Solarlite. “Our idea is to basically use the sun to produce heat, or steam in this case, and escape the competition from PVs.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,827
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,319

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetMarine and Offshore Engineering StudiesTravaux en français237 207