A52 ENDOSCOPIC CLOSURE OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER IN A PATIENT WHO WAS A CHALLENGING CANDIDATE FOR SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The incidence of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in developed countries has overall decreased but is still seen commonly in patients above the age of 60. The commonest complication of PUD is hemorrhage (73%) followed by perforation (9%) and obstruction (3%). Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is associated with a mortality of at least 25%. Traditionally, PPU is managed surgically, however the postoperative course is also associated with a high risk of complications and mortaliy. To describe the first case report of endoscopic loop and clips closure technique used for perforated gastric ulcer, augmented by video. We describe a case of a 68 year old patient with complicated past medical and surgical history who presented 9 days post small bowel resection for a partial small bowel obstruction with an acute abdomen. CT scan demonstrated a large collection in the left upper quadrant and free air, confirming perforation. He was brought to the Operating theatre emergently for an exploratory laparotomy due to his unstable status. As he had a “frozen abdomen” from severe adhesions from previous surgeries, the surgery team was unable to repair the perforation. The left upper quadrant was irrigated and a sump drain inserted. Repeat CT scan post op showed features consistent with persistent perforation. The Gastroenterology team was consulted for endoscopic closure of the perforations. Two perforated gastric ulcers were successfully repaired with the loop and clips technique. Repeat endoscopy after showed complete healing of the defects. This case presentation is augmented by video. This is the first report of the endoscopic loop and clips closure technique used for a perforated gastric ulcer, with successful outcomes. PPU is associated with a high rate of mortality and morbidity and traditionally is managed emergently by surgery. Post operative mortality for PPU is estimated to be 6–10%, and is 3 to 5 times higher in the elderly population. Endo et al first described the loop and clips technique in 2004. In the literature, multiple other techniques are described for endoscopic closure of defects PUD is commonly seen in the elderly population, PPU is a rare but dangerous complication. In our patient, who was a challenging candidate for surgical management, endoscopic repair of PPU with the loop and clips technique was successful. In select patients perhaps endoscopic repair of PPU with the loop and clips technique may be a simple and feasible alternative to operative management and its associated high risk of complications, costs of prolonged hospital stay and mortality. None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».