MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2791781860 · doi:10.5250/studamerindilite.28.4.0025

Jeannette Armstrong's <em>Slash</em> and the Indigenous Reinvention of Young Adult Literature

2016· article· en· W2791781860 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mandy Suhr-Sytsma

Notice bibliographique

RevueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousScholarshipHistorySociologyGender studiesPoetryNative American studiesMedia studiesLiteratureAnthropologyPolitical scienceArtLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Jeannette Armstrong's Slash and the Indigenous Reinvention of Young Adult Literature Mandy Suhr-Sytsma (bio) In November 2007 Sherman Alexie won the National Book Award for Young People's Literature with his novel The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian. This event might have prompted scholars to attend to other Indigenous-authored young adult (ya) texts and to examine the possibilities of the ya genre for Indigenous writers. Yet, several years after True Diary's debut, this area of scholarship remains scant. In fact, there are currently few articles and no book-length studies exclusively devoted to Indigenous-authored ya literature. Scholars, moreover, have not yet substantially explored questions about what Indigenous authors have to off er to the ya genre or what the genre has to off er to Indigenous literature. This essay, along with the larger project from which it is drawn, begins remedying these oversights. My work builds on that of Doris Seale, Beverly Slapin, Paulette Molin, Clare Bradford, and Debbie Reese. These scholars provide broad analytical surveys of texts by both non-Indigenous and Indigenous authors who represent Indigenous characters in books for young readers.1 By critiquing stereotypes and colonialist perspectives in texts by non-Native writers—including award-winning texts commonly integrated into school curricula—and by promoting texts that offer accurate nuanced representations of Native people, these scholars make crucial contributions for K–12 education and popular culture, as well as for Children's/ya literary studies. By focusing exclusively on Native-authored young adult texts and theorizing their unique approach to Native sovereignty and to the ya genre, I aim to move this area of study into a more fully realized subfield of both Indigenous studies and children's/ya literary studies. [End Page 25] reading slash as ya Much ink has been spilled in debates over the definition of young adult literature. The American Library Association (ala) defines "adolescent literature" as encompassing three categories, which Sheila Schwartz summarizes as "Books Written Specifically for Adolescents," "Books Written for General Trade Market Which Have Adolescent Heroes and Heroines," and "General Books of Interest to Young Adults" (Schwartz qtd. in Trites, Disturbing 7). While recognizing that other scholars use the ya label for texts that match any of the ala's criteria for adolescent literature, Roberta Trites, a leading scholar in the field, limits the young adult literature designation to texts specifically targeting adolescents (Disturbing 7; "Introduction" 2–3). As Trites explains in her landmark study Disturbing the Universe: Power and Repression in Adolescent Literature, literary historians mark the emergence of ya literature as a distinctive genre in the mid-twentieth century: in 1942 with the publication of Seventeenth Summer, in 1951 with The Catcher in the Rye, and in 1967 with The Outsiders (9). While Trites and other critics recognize the market-driven subjective nature of the ya label—and, to a certain extent, the category of "adolescence" itself—they also identify common characteristics of texts in the genre: these works tend to represent the latest speech patterns and consumer trends, they inevitably face censorship as a result of portraying realistic adolescent behavior, and they focus on young characters who rebel and mature as they come of age (Hunt 5–6; Trites, Disturbing 9–20). Trites makes an influential case in Disturbing the Universe that "Young Adult literature has exploded as an institution in the postmodern era because although it affirms modernity's belief in the power of the individual … it very self-consciously problematizes the relationship of the individual to the institutions that construct her or his subjectivity" (20). ya novels thus stand apart from both adult and children's texts, Trites argues, through their emphasis on power negotiations between individuals and social institutions even more so than through their focus on adolescent growth (Disturbing 20). Earlier Indigenous writers—from E. Pauline Johnson and Charles Alexander (Ohiyesa) Eastman to D'Arcy McNickle and Virginia Driving Hawk Sneeve—certainly published texts that appealed to young adults, but Okanagan author Jeannette Armstrong's 1985 Slash was the first novel by an American Indian or Canadian Aboriginal author written [End Page 26] expressly for a teen readership and thereby falling under Trites...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,061

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,009
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0000,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueStudies in American Indian LiteraturesMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207