L. M. Montgomery and War ed. by Andrea McKenzie and Jane Ledwell
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: L. M. Montgomery and War ed. by Andrea McKenzie and Jane Ledwell Adrienne Kertzer (bio) L. M. Montgomery and War. Edited by Andrea McKenzie and Jane Ledwell. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2017. Andrea McKenzie and Jane Ledwell’s edited collection has much to offer anyone interested in how readers remember female authors who do not abide by the cultural scripts defining the topics appropriate to them. While Rilla of Ingleside, the Montgomery novel most directly concerned with characters who live and die during the First World War, is the focus of many of the essays, one of the collection’s many strengths is how Rilla is nearly always viewed in a comparative context that situates it beside either the works of other artists and writers responding to the war, or other works by Montgomery. Thus, in “Mapping Patriotic Memory: L. M. Montgomery, Mary Riter Hamilton, and the Great War,” Irene Gammel explores “the subversive potential of a consoling aesthetic” (58) by juxtaposing Rilla with the work of a contemporary of Montgomery’s, the painter Mary Riter Hamilton. In contrast, in “Education for War: Anne of Green Gables and Rilla of Ingleside,” E. Holly Pike observes how many characters in Rilla regard the war as “a dividing line in history” (88), a perspective in keeping with that of Montgomery, who wrote “that the Anne series belonged to ‘the green untroubled pastures and still water’ before the war” (87). Just as Anne of Green Gables and the other Anne novels published before the First World War have a vexed relationship with the Anne books produced during and after the conflict, Montgomery’s war writing is similarly complex, moving from the longing expressed in Rilla that a better world would be born from the destructiveness of the war to a less hopeful vision as Montgomery witnessed the resurgence of global warfare. This darker vision is readily apparent in Montgomery’s treatment of Walter Blythe, whose death in battle features in Rilla. In titling their final section “Healing or Hurt? The Aftermath,” McKenzie and Ledwell clearly allude to the title of the poem that concludes Montgomery’s post-humously published The Blythes Are Quoted. In The Blythes, “The Aftermath” is attributed to Walter and presented as a poem that he composed just prior to his death. The poem’s exploration of the persona’s horror at having bayoneted a young boy prompts Anne’s relief that her son did not survive. Mirroring her own torment about the return to global conflict, Montgomery has Anne observe that Walter might have been further distressed “had he seen the futility of the sacrifice they made then mirrored in this ghastly holocaust” (Montgomery 510). One of the many questions raised by Montgomery’s war writing is how readers determine the relationship between the author and her fictional characters. Is Walter as a character authorized to express what the female author cannot? This possibility resonates in Susan Fisher’s essay “‘Watchman, What of the Night?’: L. M. Montgomery’s Poems of War.” Probing the relationship between Walter’s poetry and The Watchman and Other Poems, the only collection of poetry that Montgomery published [End Page 107] during the First World War, Fisher asks whether Montgomery intended Walter’s poem “to be taken as her last word, her ultimate assessment of the Great War” (107). The answer is not clear. That the manuscript of The Blythes Are Quoted was delivered to Montgomery’s publisher on the day of her death in 1942 is not necessarily proof of her views, for as Caroline E. Jones observes in “The Shadows of War: Interstitial Grief in L. M. Montgomery’s Final Novels,” Montgomery debated whether she should include “The Aftermath” in the manuscript. Jones reads this uncertainty as further proof of “Montgomery’s struggle . . . between the truth she experienced and the truth she so desperately longed for” (181). A second question is how concepts of gender inform Montgomery’s literary production, a topic analyzed in Laura M. Robinson’s “L. M. Montgomery’s Great War: The Home as Battleground in Rilla of Ingleside” and Maureen O. Gallagher’s “Across Enemy Lines: Gender and Nationalism in Else Ury’s and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».