LDL Receptor Gene-Ablated Hamsters: A Rodent Model of Familial Hypercholesterolemia with Dominant Inheritance and Diet-Induced Coronary Atherosclerosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder arising from a mutation in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, and is characterized by severe elevations in LDL cholesterol (LDLc) levels and circulating triglyceride (TG). FH is among the most prevalent hereditary metabolic disorders in the world, and results in advanced atherosclerotic plaque deposition, coronary artery disease (CAD), and death. Current animal models of FH poorly characterize the rapid, and lethal progression of CAD in these patients. Moreover, as an autosomal dominant disorder, the clinical severity of this disease varies between homozygous and heterozygous individuals; with this genotypic heterogeneity also failing to be faithfully reproduced in previous animal models of FH. The current article by Guo et al. addresses these issues by introducing a breakthrough LDLR knockout (KO) hamster model. This LDLR-KO hamster reproduces the phenotypical divergence seen between hetero- and homozygous individuals, and displays a dyslipidemic and atherosclerotic profile similar to humans. In the study of lipoprotein metabolism, the Syrian Golden hamster offers several clinical advantages over other rodent models of disease. Like humans, they express cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP), and exhibit intestine-specific editing of apoB lipoproteins; whereas, the lipoprotein profile of mice differs significantly from human due to non-specific lipoprotein editing and lack of CETP expression. Since the overproduction of apoB-containing lipoproteins is a proponent to the development of atherosclerosis and CAD – the primary mortality-associated risk factor in FH – it is essential that animal models closely mimic a human lipoprotein profile. Comparison of FPLC analysis between WT hamster and humans confirms this similarity, whereas, WT mice exhibit a divergent profile with markedly reduced LDL. Importantly, the phenotypic parallels seen between hamsters and humans are preserved when comparing hetero- and homozygous populations of either species; with both showing an exaggerated increase in plasma cholesterol, and overproduction of LDL as the predominant lipoprotein. Thus, the hamster LDLR-KO model represents a more physiologically applicable model for atherosclerosis research compared to other contemporary rodent models. Laboratories studying the implications of dyslipidemia in other disease states may also benefit from this model. Notably, there has been significant interest in the overproduction of intestine-derived apoB48-containing chylomicrons in insulin resistant type II diabetics (T2D). Insulin resistance has been linked to elevations in postprandial lipoprotein levels, and this dyslipidemia is now emerging as a major contributor to the development of CVD and atherosclerosis (Higgins and Adeli, 2017Higgins V. Adeli K. Postprandial dyslipidemia: pathophysiology and cardiovascular disease risk assessment.EJIFCC. 2017; 28: 168-184PubMed Google Scholar; Patsch et al., 1992Patsch J.R. Miesenböck G. Hopferwieser T. Mühlberger V. Knapp E. Dunn J.K. Gotto A.M. Patsch W. Relation of triglyceride metabolism and coronary artery disease. Studies in the postprandial state.Arterioscler. Thromb. 1992; 12: 1336-1345Crossref PubMed Scopus (1112) Google Scholar). The hamster LDLR-KO model may be particularly applicable to this research as postprandial TG levels were higher in Ldlr−/+ and Ldlr−/− hamsters, indicating delayed chylomicron clearance in mutants. In contrast, VLDL secretion was unchanged between mutant and WT hamsters, which suggests that a sustained accumulation of postprandial chlyomicrons is proponent to atherosclerotic plaque deposition. This is emphasized by the fact that intestinally-derived apoB48 is able to bind to proteoglycans on the arterial wall with similar affinity as liver-derived apoB100 (Flood et al., 2002Flood C. Gustafsson M. Richardson P.E. Harvey S.C. Segrest J.P. Borén J. Identification of the proteoglycan binding site in apolipoprotein B48.J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 32228-32233https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M204053200Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar); and subendothelial retention of apoB lipoproteins is considered to be the initiating event in atherosclerosis (Proctor et al., 2002Proctor S.D. Vine D.F. Mamo J.C.L. Arterial retention of apolipoprotein B48- and B100-containing lipoproteins in atherogenesis.Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2002; 13: 461-470https://doi.org/10.1097/00041433-200210000-00001Crossref PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar). Furthermore, Ldlr−/− hamsters showed a high degree of mortality on a high cholesterol high fat (HCHF) diet, which was associated with advanced atherosclerosis in the aorta and coronary arteries. This relationship is further evidenced by the discovery that ezetimibe - a selective inhibitor of cholesterol absorption from the intestine - was the only pharmacological intervention able to successfully lower total plasma cholesterol and TG in mutant hamsters. This finding is of particular importance since the average adult in western society is commonly in the postprandial state, and that cell surface expression of the LDL receptor is decreased by 41% in type II diabetic individuals (Duvillard et al., 2003Duvillard L. Florentin E. Lizard G. Petit J.-M. Galland F. Monier S. Gambert P. Vergès B. Cell surface expression of LDL receptor is decreased in type 2 diabetic patients and is normalized by insulin therapy.Diabetes Care. 2003; 26: 1540-1544Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar). Therefore, this model may provide novel insight into the mechanisms of both postprandial and fasting dyslipidemia. Moreover, it has already demonstrated value in determining the efficacy of new and existing pharmacological therapies which target plasma LDLc. Currently, LDLR-KO mice are among several animal models utilized in the study of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, this hamster model may prove to be a more appropriate model for several reasons. Firstly, LDLR-KO mice require several months of HCHF feeding to initiate a sustained inflammatory and fibrotic response in the liver (Bieghs et al., 2012Bieghs V. Van Gorp P.J. Wouters K. Hendrikx T. Gijbels M.J. van Bilsen M. Bakker J. Binder C.J. Lütjohann D. Staels B. Hofker M.H. Shiri-Sverdlov R. LDL receptor knock-out mice are a physiological model particularly vulnerable to study the onset of inflammation in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.PLoS One. 2012; 7e30668https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030668Crossref Scopus (122) Google Scholar); with high fat diet alone being insufficient to induce inflammatory infiltrate (Kong et al., 2009Kong B. Luyendyk J.P. Tawfik O. Guo G.L. Farnesoid X receptor deficiency induces nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in low-density lipoprotein receptor-knockout mice fed a high-fat diet.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009; 328: 116-122https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.108.144600Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar). Whereas, when fed a HCHF diet for two weeks, Ldlr−/+ hamsters showed significant increases in plasma triglyceride and total cholesterol, suggesting that the hamster model is more susceptible to dyslipidemia. Second, the development of NAFLD and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by elevations in plasma TG and hepatic overproduction of LDL paired with diminished HDL (Fon Tacer and Rozman, 2011Fon Tacer K. Rozman D. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: focus on lipoprotein and lipid deregulation.J Lipids. 2011; 2011 (783976–14)https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/783976Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Mice, however, lack CETP and are therefore HDL heavy, with even LDLR-KO mice showing meagre rises in LDL plasma levels, and no changes in HDL. Thus, the lipoprotein mechanics in the KO hamster model is far better suited to model this disorder. Overall, the LDLR-KO hamster described here heralds a breakthrough for the study of lipid metabolism. Specifically, it produces a far more clinically relevant model in which to study dyslipidemia, as it relates to several metabolic disorders, including atherosclerosis, NAFLD, and T2D. The authors declare no conflict of interest. LDL Receptor Gene-ablated Hamsters: A Rodent Model of Familial Hypercholesterolemia With Dominant Inheritance and Diet-induced Coronary AtherosclerosisFamilial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease caused mainly by LDL receptor (Ldlr) gene mutations. Unlike FH patients, heterozygous Ldlr knockout (KO) mice do not show a dominant FH trait. Hamsters, like humans, have the cholesteryl ester transfer protein, intestine-only ApoB editing and low hepatic cholesterol synthesis. Here, we generated Ldlr-ablated hamsters using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Homozygous Ldlr KO hamsters on a chow diet developed hypercholesterolemia with LDL as the dominant lipoprotein and spontaneous atherosclerosis. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».