MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2792723400 · doi:10.1111/bjd.16099

Risk of depression among patients with acne in the U.K.: a population-based cohort study

2018· letter· en· W2792723400 sur OpenAlexafffund
Isabelle A. Vallerand, Ryan T. Lewinson, Laurie Parsons, Mark Lowerison, Alexandra Frolkis, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Cheryl Barnabé, Andrew G. M. Bulloch, Scott B. Patten

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Dermatology · 2018
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsMach-Gaensslen Foundation of Canada
Mots-clésDepression (economics)AcneMedicineCohortCohort studyPopulationPsychiatryInternal medicineDermatologyEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dear Editor, Acne has been associated with adverse psychiatric symptoms.1 In dermatology outpatient clinics, approximately 25.2% of patients with acne experience some psychiatric morbidity.2 However, few studies have evaluated the clinically significant diagnostic category of major depressive disorder (MDD) among people with acne. Here, we investigated whether patients with acne are at an increased risk of developing MDD compared to the general population, using one of the largest electronic medical records databases in the world. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) (1986–2012), a large primary care database in the U.K. that also includes data from specialists. All individuals between 7 and 50 years of age with ≥ 1 Read codes (diagnostic codes linked to International Classification of Diseases codes) for acne were identified. A general population cohort without acne was also identified. The study was approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (ID 24423) and from the Scientific Review Committee in the U.K. (ID 16THIN036), authorizing access to extract relevant data from THIN. A complete list of codes used to identify exposures, outcomes and covariates is available from the authors. All patients were followed from their start date for ≥ 2 years in THIN until the earliest of either their first MDD Read code (main outcome),3,4 transfer out of practice, death or end of data collection. Observations were censored at the end of follow‐up in patients where MDD was not observed during the study period. To identify only incident cases, patients with an acne or MDD Read code prior to the start of follow‐up were excluded. Baseline covariates at the start of follow‐up included age (young ≤ 19; adult > 19 years),5 sex, obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg m−2), smoking status (never, former, current), alcohol use (yes or no), medical comorbidities using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (0 or ≥ 1 comorbidity) and socioeconomic status using the Townsend Deprivation Index (quintiles 1–5, with 1 least and 5 most deprivation). Cox proportional hazards models stratified by time were constructed with estimates reported as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). A likelihood‐ratio test was used to assess statistical interactions. Confounding was assessed by whether a substantial change (≥ 10%) to the estimated HR resulted with removal of each covariate. Sensitivity analyses were conducted whereby patients prescribed isotretinoin were removed from analyses. A total of 134 437 patients with incident acne and 1 731 608 patients without acne were identified in THIN. Patients with acne were more frequently younger (67.6% vs. 22.8%), female (58.6% vs. 48.6%), of higher socioeconomic status (24.4% vs. 22.1%), never smokers (58.4% vs. 48.6%) and had a comorbidity (17.2% vs. 13.8%), but less frequently were alcohol users (17.0% vs. 39.0%) or obese (2.3% vs. 6.6%) (all P < 0.001). Over the 15‐year follow‐up, the probability of developing MDD was 18.5% among patients with acne and 12.0% in the general population without acne. Patients with acne had a significantly increased risk of developing MDD after adjustment for all covariates but only in the first 5 years after being diagnosed with acne. This risk was highest within 1 year of acne diagnosis (adjusted HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33–2.00) and decreased thereafter (Fig. 1). No statistical interactions were observed at any time point. In the first 5 years following an acne diagnosis, sex was the only covariate producing a confounding effect. At 10 and 15 years, both sex and obesity demonstrated confounding effects. The increased risk of MDD among patients with acne remained unchanged after excluding patients who were prescribed isotretinoin (n = 900), who may have the most severe acne. Hazard ratios (HR) for the development of depression among patients with acne over time. The HRs shown indicate the risk of depression in patients with acne relative to the general population at various time points post‐acne diagnosis. These HRs were determined from fully adjusted models (aHR) including age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking, alcohol use and obesity. These results were unchanged after excluding patients who received isotretinoin (< 1‐year HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33–2.00; 5‐year HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88–1.17; 10‐year HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86–1.31; 15‐year HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.76–1.74). CI, Confidence interval. *Statistical significance, P < 0.05. Our results indicate that the onset of acne, when patients present for treatment because of active disease, is associated with a greater risk of developing depression. Although the severity of acne was not assessed directly in the current study, this finding suggests a potential dose–response relationship such that more active disease may lead to a greater risk of depression. In this study, female patients were more likely to have acne (or to present to a physician) and were also more likely to develop MDD, which is consistent with existing literature.6,7 At 10 and 15 years, both sex and obesity demonstrated confounding effects, so future research on the disease course of acne should account for these variables. A potential limitation of this study is that cases of acne or MDD may have been misclassified if patients with either condition did not present to a physician for treatment. Additionally, treatment for acne other than isotretinoin was not considered; however, as treatment has been shown to improve depressive symptoms,8 we believe that the estimates reported here are conservative. Lastly, significant results should be interpreted based on clinical relevance given the large sample size. In conclusion, given the tremendous burden of MDD and its temporal association with active acne, it is critical that physicians monitor mood symptoms in patients with acne and initiate prompt MDD management or seek consultation from a psychiatrist when needed. Funding sources: I.A.V. received funding for this project from an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions MD‐PhD Studentship and from the Mach‐Gaensslen Foundation of Canada. Conflicts of interest: none declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,047
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,094

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations58
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of DermatologyMême sujetAcne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsTravaux en français237 207