Cancer control planning by international cancer control partnerships: an exploration of planning practices and resources in diverse settings
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As the cancer burden increases worldwide and costs of cancer care continue to grow,1Jemal A Vineis P Bray F Torre L Forman D The cancer atlas.2nd edn. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA2014Google Scholar, 2Bray F Soerjomataram I The changing global burden of cancer: transitions in human development and implications for cancer prevention and control.in: Gelband H Jha P Sankaranarayanan R Horton S Volume 3: cancer. Disease Control Priorities. 3rd edn. World Bank, Washington, DC2015Crossref Google Scholar countries are seeking to understand how to effectively mitigate the dramatic health and economic consequences of cancer. Given that cancer is a large set of diseases requiring intervention at multiple stages, from prevention to multi-modal treatment and care for survivors and at end-of-life care, population-level cancer control is complex and necessitates substantial health-system capacity and investment. Additionally, many interventions require extensive involvement of non-health sectors. Comprehensive tobacco control programmes, for example, often include engagement from sectors as diverse as law enforcement, media, legislatures, and the business community.3Best A Clark PI Leischow SJ Trochim WMK Greater than the sum: systems thinking in tobacco control. Tobacco Control Monograph, No 18. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD2007Google Scholar Such sizeable efforts rely on strategic planning and considerable forethought to maximise effectiveness, quality, safety, and sustainability. For this reason, WHO has consistently called for countries to develop national plans for cancer control. Most recently, a resolution for cancer prevention and control in the context of an integrated approach was adopted at the 2017 World Health Assembly.4World Health AssemblyCancer prevention and control in the context of an integrated approach. World Health Organization, Geneva2017: 1-6Google Scholar A Cancer Control Plan (CCP), at its most basic level, is a strategic plan to prevent and control cancer for a specific population (typically for a country, state, or province). Far more complicated is addressing a specific population's unique cancer burden, risk factor prevalence, unique culture and context, governance and health systems, and resources in a meaningful way within a CCP. Furthermore, a CCP must be successfully implemented to have its intended effect on health outcomes. Barriers to implementation necessitate a multisectoral, whole-of-society approach to CCP development and enactment that includes substantial and sustained commitment, flexibility in approaches, and cohesive collaboration.5IARCWorld cancer report 2014. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France2014Google Scholar The Toronto Global Cancer Control Conference, March 1–3, 2018, provides an excellent platform to explore diverse cancer control planning issues. At the conference, we will explore how cancer control planning has been approached in different settings and aim to examine four specific aspects of cancer control planning: (1) foundational elements of planning that are crucial to successful CCP implementation in most settings; (2) different structural, cultural, and resource contexts to identify some of the unique opportunities and challenges in cancer planning; (3) multisectoral collaboration in cancer planning and relevant outcomes; and (4) specific international and intranational partnerships, including the International Cancer Control Partnership6International Cancer Control Partnershiphttp://www.iccp-portal.orgGoogle Scholar, 7Torode J Collins K Kostelecky B Morton-Doherty R Stevens LM Vinson C The International Cancer Control Partnership: building capacity in cancer control planning.https://www.uicc.org/sites/main/files/atoms/files/BuildingCapacityICCP.pdfDate: 2015Google Scholar and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer,8Fairclough L Hill J Bryant H Kitchen-Clarke L Accelerating knowledge to action: the pan-Canadian cancer control strategy.Curr Oncol. 2012; 19: 70-77Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar and how they provide cancer control planning support. The importance of context in comprehensive cancer prevention and control means that there will never be a one-size-fits-all approach to cancer control planning. Countries can, however, learn important lessons from one another about productive approaches, important considerations to address, questions to ask, and avenues used to overcome barriers. Partnership-building within countries, across regions, and around the world can provide ways to connect people with skills and knowledge to share relevant information and approaches. We declare no competing interests.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,054 | 0,073 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,020 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,026 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».