Injury Mortality in Vietnam: Patterns and Trends, 2005-2013
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
CONTEXT: Injury is a growing public health problem worldwide. Deaths due to injuries account for 10% of the world's mortality. More than 90% of the world's injury-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries such as Vietnam. The public health burden has been recognized by government; however, there is a need to study and better understand the epidemiology and trends for injuries and injury-related mortality to be able to better address this burden. OBJECTIVES: In this article, we analyze the patterns and trends in injury mortality from 2005 to 2013 in Vietnam. DESIGN: All registered deaths from injuries from January 2005 to December 2013 were extracted from the Ministry of Health death recording system (A6). Mortality rates per 100 000 population per year were calculated. A linear regression model was used to estimate the injury mortality trends. RESULTS: In the 9-year period, 313 101 deaths due to injuries were recorded in the A6 system; this accounts for about 10% of all deaths. The leading causes of injury-related death were road traffic injuries among the entire population, while drowning was the leading cause of death among children. Other unintentional injuries including occupational, fall, poisoning, and exposure to electric current also accounted for a substantial proportion of the burden of injury. There is a significant reduction trend found in drowning among children 0 to 18 years of age and significant increasing trends in intentional injury causes. CONCLUSIONS: While injuries have been recognized as a public health problem in Vietnam in the last decade, as seen by our analysis, there is a need for concerted action to reduce their burden. Of particular concern is the increasing prominence of intentional injuries. Improved data systems, increasing the awareness in the community, and making appropriate policies and implementing them, as well as implementing effective, evidence-based interventions are all key to decreasing this burden. This is an important study describing injury mortality in Vietnam for the period 2005-2013. The results of the study show that injury death remains an important public health issue that needs more attention from government and relevant agencies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».