A16 SUCCESS OF ENHANCED PRIMARY CARE PATHWAYS IN MANAGING ROUTINE GI REFERRALS.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
GI Central Access and Triage in Calgary is a single point of entry for referrals. As in most Canadian centres, there has been a sharp increase in demand for GI consultation services resulting in prolonged wait times, especially for non-urgent referrals. In order to address this care gap (currently >24 months), evidence-based Enhanced Primary Care Pathways (EPCPs) were developed as a unique collaboration between the GI Division and Primary Care Network leaders in the Calgary Zone in an effort to provide optimized care in the medical home without a one-on-one GI consultation. EPCPs were developed for GERD, dyspepsia, chronic constipation, IBS and refractory H. pylori. A phased launch was conducted with the GERD and dyspepsia pathways implemented first. Specific criteria were developed to guide which patients were suitable for these pathways. If an EPCP was enacted, a formal GI consultation visit was not planned, however, a dedicated telephone hotline (GI Specialist Link) was simultaneously launched to provide access to a GI specialist for management advice during business hours. These patients were tracked prospectively in a database for future health system encounters. As part of the EPCP, if the suggested management failed or there was a change in symptomatology, re-referral to GI was prompted. From January 2015-June 2016, 667 cases were triaged to an EPCP thus the referral was sent back for management in the medical home. Over this time period, 54 EPCP patients (7.9%) had an emergency room visit in the Calgary zone. Of the 667 EPCP patients, the re-referral rate to GI was 9.6% (64 cases). The reasons for re-entry back into the system are shown in Table 1. All 64 patients went on to have an endoscopic procedure (EGD=47, colonoscopy=17). Forty-one of the 64 endoscopies (64%) were reported as normal. Significant findings included esophagitis (n=7), non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (n=3) and moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis (n=1). No malignancies were detected. The majority of non-urgent GI referrals were successfully managed in a primary care setting using EPCPs thus providing an alternative to traditional queue-based GI consultations. This process has served as a template for other specialty groups in Calgary looking to address similar care gaps. Future plans include physician/patient satisfaction surveys and focus groups to determine if any additional supports are needed to aid the medical homes in caring for these patients. Reasons for re-referral to GI after EPCP pathway enacted (n=64) None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,016 | 0,035 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».