Abstract P3-08-08: Prognostic associations of plasma hepcidin in early breast cancer (BC)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Intra-tumor RNA expression of hepcidin has been linked to adverse metastasis-free survival in women with early BC, but the prognostic implications of this inflammatory marker and iron-regulating peptide are unknown. Methods: Using an ELISA assay, we measured plasma hepcidin in the banked blood of 518 women who were recruited from 1989-1996 for a prospective cohort study regarding diet and lifestyle factors in BC. Blood had been obtained 4-12 weeks post-operatively and prior to treatment with radiation, chemotherapy or hormonal therapy. Women ages 18 to 75 with T1-3, N0-1, M0 BC who underwent surgery and axillary dissection were included; those with metabolic disorders were excluded. Tumor size, grade and ER/PR expression were abstracted from pathology reports; HER2 status was unknown. Median follow-up was 12.1 years (range, 0.2 to 17 years). Univariable Cox regression models were used to determine the association between hepcidin and i) time to distant BC recurrence (primary outcome), and ii) time to death due to any cause. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for age (continuous), T stage (T2, T3, Tx vs T1), tumor grade (3 vs 2 or 1), N stage (node positive vs negative), ER/PR expression (both ER and PR negative vs either positive) a-priori. Associations between hepcidin and CRP, IL6, insulin, cholesterol, glucose, vitamin D, total iron, transferrin, and soluble transferrin receptor; sTfR were explored (Pearson's coefficients). Results: Hepcidin ranged from 4.70-190.70 ng/L (median 16.25; IQR 16.40 ng/L). To ensure normal distribution, a transformed [-1/sqrt (x)] hepcidin variable was used for prognostic analyses. Average age was 50.3±9.7 years. 16% were obese [body mass index (BMI) >30kg/m2], 30% (n=156) were node positive, 35% (n=181) had grade 3 tumors and 71% (n=370) had ER and/or PR positive tumors. 77% underwent a lumpectomy, 73% (n=380) received adjuvant radiotherapy and 39% (n=203) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Plasma hepcidin was not univariably associated with either time to distant BC recurrence (HR for 75th percentile versus 25th 1.20; 95%CI 0.79-1.32) or time to death due to any cause (HR 1.23; 95%CI 0.95-1.59) in the overall cohort; multivariable results were similar. In pre-planned analyses, the prognostic association of hepcidin differed by BMI (≤30 vs >30 kg/m2; interaction p-values <0.05): among obese women, higher hepcidin was significantly associated with a shorter time to distant BC recurrence in both univariable (HR 1.81; 95%CI 1.06–3.10) and multivariable (HR 1.84; 95%CI 1.04–3.25) models. Higher hepcidin was associated with shorter time to death due to any cause in a univariable model (HR 1.91; 95%CI 1.13–3.22) but not in a multivariable analysis. There was a moderate association between hepcidin and total iron (r=0.35), transferrin (r=0.43) and sTfR (r=-0.39); associations with IL6, CRP and metabolic factors were very weak (r<0.2). Conclusion: Higher plasma hepcidin was independently associated with a shorter time to distant BC recurrence in obese women but not in the overall cohort. Further investigation of hepcidin and mechanisms linking it to adverse BC outcomes is warranted. Citation Format: Jerzak KJ, Lohmann AE, Ennis M, Nemeth E, Ganz T, Goodwin PJ. Prognostic associations of plasma hepcidin in early breast cancer (BC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-08.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».