MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2793391494 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2017.0022

Introduction to Special Section Youngsters: On the Cultures of Children and Youth

2017· article· en· W2793391494 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Naomi Hamer, Stuart R. Poyntz

Notice bibliographique

RevueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueChildren's Rights and Participation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipIndigenousSociologyPublishingMedia studiesSection (typography)The artsYouth cultureLibrary scienceGender studiesVisual artsArtPolitical scienceLawLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction to Special Section Youngsters: On the Cultures of Children and Youth Naomi Hamer (bio) and Stuart R. Poyntz (bio) Click for larger view View full resolution On October 20–22, 2016, the Association for Research in Cultures of Young People (ARCYP) hosted the inaugural international conference, Youngsters: On the Cultures of Children and Youth (Youngsters 2016) at Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, British Columbia, on the unceded traditional territories of the Musqueam, Squamish, and Tsleil-Waututh First Nations. The first conference of its kind in North America, Youngsters 2016 was created to explore the intersections between childhood and youth studies as interdisciplinary fields of scholarship and community engagement. Drawing together internationally renowned researchers from across the social sciences and humanities, with child- and youth-engaged artists, community groups, and students, Youngsters 2016 offered new sightlines from which to see connections and establish future directions for our [End Page 14] work. The conference’s three keynote speakers—Steven Bruhm, the Robert and Ruth Lumsden Professor of English at Western University; Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, Professor and Chair of Modern Media and Culture at Brown University; and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, Indigenous author, artist, scholar, activist, and member of the Alderville First Nation—set the tone for the interdisciplinary nature of the conference. Building on these distinguished keynotes, the conference also planned a special round table on “Youngsters and the Arts,” featuring Vancouver-based artists, and one on writing and publishing in children’s and youth studies, with Jeunesse lead editor Dr. Heather Snell and founding editor Dr. Mavis Reimer as panellists. The research paper sessions, including “Queer Youth Cultures,” “Writing Indigeneity,” “Rights and Resistance,” and “Mental Wellness,” were designed not only to address significant contemporary research topics in the field but also to encourage dialogue across disciplines, methodological approaches, and international contexts, and to challenge the boundaries among practitioners, artists, and scholars. The Special Section of Jeunesse that follows is a celebration of this event with a sample from the range of presented work. As past and current Presidents of the ARCYP, as well as conference coordinators, we believe that there are multiple pressing issues that support the need for an event like Youngsters 2016. To begin with, a prevailing sense of crisis and fundamental change in the lives of young people is present across a range of communities and identities today. We can mark these prevailing intensities through a host of concerns and tensions that indicate a general broadening of risk taking and risk bearing as properties of young lives (Appadurai). Risk and precarity have, of course, long been associated with what it means to be young. In the West, as the notion of youth culture emerged in the early-to-mid-twentieth century, for instance, to be young seemed tied to notions of transition and flux, to experiences of change that were thought to shape the development of youthful imaginations, identities, and sexualities. The very boundaries between childhood, adolescence, and adulthood, are increasingly uncertain and treated with suspicion by many. Moreover, historical and contemporary popular cultures, legal discourses, and educational policies around youth and childhood tend to be rooted in ideologies of race, gender, sexuality, physical mobility, and socio-economic class that privilege generalized assumptions about the experiences of young people across diverse identities, cultural backgrounds, and geographies. The project of unpacking and challenging assumptions, absences, and histories is an integral part of current work across disciplines in the field of childhood and youth studies. Meanwhile, what it means to be a child—to play, to learn, and to imagine—is being recast by the new and profound conditions of mediation, surveillance, participation, and commodification that characterize the contemporary moment. Amid these pressing issues, to date there has been no umbrella academic organization or regular [End Page 15] conference to bring together scholars working in childhood and youth studies, particularly those focused on the cultures of young people. If surprising, this is in part a function of how recent the development of the field of childhood studies is. The year 1991 is often thought to mark the consolidation and beginning of childhood studies as a distinct field of inquiry. In that year, Brooklyn College at City University of New...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,162
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,544

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0070,006
Science ouverte0,0020,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1620,075

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,296
Écart entre enseignants0,278 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesMême sujetChildren's Rights and ParticipationTravaux en français237 207