MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2793484883 · doi:10.1093/obo/9780195399301-0071

Catherine de' Medici

2011· dataset· en· W2793484883 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katherine Crawford

Notice bibliographique

RevueRenaissance and Reformation · 2011
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArtHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Catherine de’ Medici (b. 1519–d. 1589), wife of Henri II (r. 1547–1559) and mother of François II, Charles IX, and Henri III, never ruled in her own right, but she was perhaps the most influential—and controversial—figure at the center of French politics during one of the most troubled periods in French history. The combination of her lack of official authority and the difficulties created by religious civil war have shaped responses to Catherine since her lifetime. Some historians, picking up on contemporary attitudes, have been critical of her for failing to understand the significance of religion to most of her contemporaries. Inclined toward limited toleration, Catherine was considered irreligious by some at a time when Catholic orthodoxy was increasingly seen as a crucial aspect of social order. Critics in her lifetime and since have painted Catherine as Machiavellian in her politics because of her repeated attempts to end civil war through negotiation. Despite efforts to rehabilitate Catherine for managing reasonably well under extremely difficult circumstances, historians regard her as responsible to some degree for the troubles of the French state in the latter half of the sixteenth century. Crucially, because Catherine served as regent for Charles IX (r. 1560–1574) and remained a senior advisor to both Charles and his brother, Henri III (r. 1574–1589), her political influence was significant for three decades. Because Charles started his reign underage, Catherine was effectively ruling when religious tensions erupted into open warfare. The monarchy had neither the military nor the economic resources to impose peace on the combatants. The compromises that Catherine supported satisfied neither Catholics nor Protestants, although it should be emphasized that when the Wars of Religion were settled in 1598 by Henri IV (r. 1589–1610), the structure of the peace was very much along the lines that Catherine had always advocated. Given the political and economic difficulties, historians have tended to regard the period of Catherine’s influence as one in which the French monarchy was weak and ineffectual. As recent studies have demonstrated, the monarchy was actually committed to reforms of various kinds. Catherine’s sons restructured aspects of royal authority, including the management of noble elites, local political structures in towns, and the administration of justice. In the cultural life of the realm, Catherine utilized artistic patronage to further political messaging in ways that became integral to monarchical political practice. Her support of pictorial arts, architecture, tapestries, and ceremonial arts modeled how to convey political, social, and cultural messaging for different kinds of audiences. Catherine de’ Medici was neither the cause of the ills that plagued France in the late sixteenth century, nor completely free of responsibility for those ills. She was often able to find ways to facilitate peace, whether through negotiation, distribution of political patronage, or utilizing her authority as queen mother. But the fact that she repeatedly needed to facilitate peace, calm the troubled waters, and recall important noble families to their obligations to the king and kingdom meant that she was recurrently exposed to criticism.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,037
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,651

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRenaissance and ReformationMême sujetRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesTravaux en français237 207