A110 USE OF PROBIOTICS, PREBIOTICS AND DIETARY FIBRE SUPPLEMENTS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic inflammatory conditions of the intestines likely induced by abnormal immune response to resident intestinal bacteria in genetically susceptible hosts. Probiotics, prebiotics and dietary fibres alter the gut microbiota and improve its function, thus potentially counteracting the development of inflammation. Although the role of these compounds in the prevention and management of IBD is relatively understudied, anecdotal evidence suggests widespread, undocumented use of these supplements by patients. Investigating the use of probiotics and prebiotics by IBD patients and association with disease severity may allow for optimization of therapy and improved clinical outcomes. To assess if the self-motivated intake of probiotics, prebiotics and dietary fibre supplements is associated with the disease severity in patients with IBD. We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients with a diagnosis of IBD in the University of Alberta IBD clinic. Using a 20-item questionnaire we collected data from patients on demographics, disease characteristics and knowledge and use of probiotics, prebiotics and dietary fibre supplements. We used a chart review to ascertain the occurrence of flares, disease duration and objective markers of inflammation such as fecal calprotectin (FCP) as indicators of disease severity. In this study, 100 participants (45% females) with a known diagnosis of IBD (47% Crohn’s disease, 34% ulcerative colitis, 19% IBD-unclassified) completed questionnaires. Large proportions of participants were knowledgeable about probiotics (88%) and dietary fibres (76%), but less about prebiotics (42%). The majority of users had Crohn’s disease (42% CD vs. 35% UC, p=0.33). 66% of surveyed patients had used these products as an alternate therapy. Disease flares in the last two years did not have an effect on usage (73% users vs. 71% non-users, p=0.8). The use of alternative therapies was higher in patients with longer history of IBD (77% in those with a duration >5 years vs. 22% in those with a duration <5 years, p=1.0). Close to half of patients (48%) with a fecal calprotectin (FCP) >250 µg/g (an indicator of acute disease) during the preceding six months reported supplement use, compared to 52% with FCP values below this value (P=0.11). This study shows that a large proportion of IBD patients are interested in alternative therapies for IBD. Increased flare frequency and objective markers of inflammation did not have an effect on usage. However, longer disease history was the main factor influencing the search for a “cure” by the patients. These microbiota-altering strategies have the ability to affect disease outcomes, therefore clinicians and researchers should identify and document their use. CIHR
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».