DNSS: Dual-Normal-Space Sampling for 3-D ICP Registration
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rigid registration is a fundamental process in many applications that require alignment of different datasets. Iterative closest point (ICP) is a widely used algorithm that iteratively finds point correspondences and updates the rigid transformation. One of the key variants of ICP to its success is the selection of points, which is directly related to the convergence and robustness of the ICP algorithm. Besides uniform sampling, there are a number of normal-based and feature-based approaches that consider normal, curvature, and/or other signals in the point selection. Among them, normal-space sampling (NSS) is one of the most popular techniques due to its simplicity and low computational cost. The rationale of NSS is to sample enough constraints to determine all the components of transformation, but this paper finds that NSS actually can constrain the translational normal space only. This paper extends the fundamental idea of NSS and proposes Dual NSS (DNSS) to sample points in both translational and rotational normal spaces. Compared with NSS, this approach has similar simplicity and efficiency without any need of additional information, but has a much better effectiveness. Experimental results show that DNSS can outperform the normal-based and feature-based methods in terms of convergence and robustness. For example, DNSS can achieve convergence from an orthogonal initial position while no other methods can achieve. Note to Practitioners-ICP is commonly used to align different data to a same coordination system. While NSS is often used to speed up the alignment process by down-sampling the data uniformly in the normal space. The implementation of NSS only has three steps: 1) construct a set of buckets in the normal-space; 2) put all points of the data into buckets based on their normal direction; and 3) uniformly pick points from all the buckets until the desired number of points is selected. The algorithm is simple and fast, so that it is still the common practice. However, the weakness of NSS comes from the reason that it cannot handle rotational uncertainties. In this paper, a new algorithm called DNSS is developed to constrain both translation and rotation at the same time by introducing a dual-normal space. With a new definition of the normal space, the algorithm complexity of DNSS is the same as that of NSS, and it can be readily implemented in all types of application that are currently using ICP. The experimental results show that DNSS has better efficiency, quality, and reliability than both normal-based and feature-based methods have.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle