Oil and natural gas development influence nest‐site selection and nest survival of upland‐nesting waterfowl and shorebirds
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Native grasslands provide important breeding habitat for many upland‐nesting waterfowl and shorebirds. However, recent increases in oil and gas development in native grassland may alter the quantity and quality of this globally threatened habitat. Oil and natural gas development involves construction of roads, trails, and wells; often facilitating invasion by exotic vegetation. Our objectives were to determine 1) whether nest placement by upland‐nesting waterfowl and shorebirds varied with proximity to oil and gas infrastructure; and 2) the extent to which nest survival was influenced by proximity to wells, roads, and trails, as well as percent cover of the exotic crested wheatgrass in southeastern Alberta, Canada, 2010–2011. Mallard ( Anas platyrhynchos ) and blue‐winged teal ( Spatula discors ) nests were located within 100 m of wells more than expected by chance, and northern shoveler ( Spatula clypeata ) and northern pintail ( Anas acuta ) tended to nest more frequently within 200 m of wells. In contrast, more shorebird nests were located farther from wells than expected. Mallards and blue‐winged teal were also more likely to place their nests near roads. Shorebirds tended to place their nests either close to roads or far from these structures more often than expected by chance. The proportion of mallard nests located in close proximity to trails was greater than expected, but fewer blue‐winged teal nests were located near trails than expected by chance. The top‐ranked models explaining variation in daily nest survival rates of northern shoveler, mallard, and shorebirds included distance to infrastructure variables, although these relationships were weak. Northern shovelers appear to benefit from placing nests closer to trails; daily nest survival rate increased with proximity to trails. However, trails may act as an ecological sink for shorebirds; they were more likely to place nests near trails but daily survival rates were lower near trails. © 2018 The Wildlife Society.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».