MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2794111128 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.03.001

Vaccines for Improved Cellular Immunity to Influenza

2018· letter· en· W2794111128 sur OpenAlexaff
Graham Pawelec, Janet E. McElhaney

Notice bibliographique

RevueEBioMedicine · 2018
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Établissements canadiensHealth Sciences North
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVirologyInfluenza vaccineImmunityAntibodyImmunologyVaccinationHemagglutinin (influenza)BiologyDiseaseVirusMedicineImmune system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Influenza disease remains a major global public health problem, especially for the elderly, despite intensive efforts to develop more effective vaccines. The seasonal vaccines currently in use suffer from many disadvantages, particularly their poor capacity to elicit cellular immunity and the strain specificity of the antibody response. The selection of target strains is based on prediction of dominant emerging strains in the upcoming season, which may not be altogether accurate. Many efforts in the search for a “universal” influenza vaccine have been directed towards eliciting antibodies binding to the stem region of the viral hemagglutinin conserved between strains, rather than the highly variable globular head domain (Ekiert and Wilson, 2012Ekiert D.C. Wilson I.A. Broadly neutralizing antibodies against influenza virus and prospects for universal therapies.Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012; 2: 134-141https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2012.02.005Crossref PubMed Scopus (121) Google Scholar). However, there is a great deal of evidence suggesting that optimal protection against clinical disease correlates more closely with the ability of the vaccine to stimulate T cell responses than with the antibody titers that are routinely assessed as a surrogate for vaccine efficacy (McElhaney et al., 2006McElhaney J.E. Xie D. Hager W.D. Barry M.B. Wang Y. Kleppinger A. et al.T cell responses are better correlates of vaccine protection in the elderly.J. Immunol. 2006; 176: 6333-6339Crossref PubMed Scopus (438) Google Scholar). Indeed, this is underlined by findings from epidemiological studies showing that the presence of pre-challenge T cells responsive to influenza A nucleoprotein (NP) correlated with some protection against infection, even in the absence of antibodies (Hayward et al., 2015Hayward A.C. Wang L. Goonetilleke N. Fragaszy E.B. Bermingham A. Copas A. et al.Natural T cell-mediated protection against seasonal and pandemic influenza. Results of the flu watch cohort study.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015; 191: 1422-1431https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201411-1988OCCrossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar). An ideal vaccine would therefore be an “off-the-shelf” product capable of eliciting long-lasting protective T-cell and B cell-mediated immunity independent of the particular viral strains in circulation at any one time, and which is equally effective in at-risk populations, such as the elderly or diabetics (Remschmidt et al., 2015Remschmidt C. Wichmann O. Harder T. Vaccines for the prevention of seasonal influenza in patients with diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Med. 2015; 1353https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0295-6Crossref Scopus (71) Google Scholar). The EBioMedicine paper by Coughlan et al., 2018Coughlan L. Sridhar S. Payne R. et al.Heterologous two-dose vaccination with simian adenovirus and poxvirus vectors elicits long-lasting cellular immunity to influenza virus a in healthy adults.EBioMedicine. 2018; 29 (this issue): 146-154Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar describes significant steps taken in this direction in a phase I clinical trial of vaccines designed to boost such T cell responses in both younger and older adults. Testing new vaccines in the elderly is extremely important because older people commonly respond poorly to current vaccines, most likely primarily due to deficits in antigen presentation by dendritic cells and T cell responses rather than any intrinsic inability of their B cells to produce antibodies (van Duin et al., 2007van Duin D. Allore H.G. Mohanty S. Ginter S. Newman F.K. Belshe R.B. et al.Prevaccine determination of the expression of costimulatory B7 molecules in activated monocytes predicts influenza vaccine responses in young and older adults.J. Infect. Dis. 2007; 195: 1590-1597https://doi.org/10.1086/516788Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar). Building on long-standing earlier investigations (Lillie et al., 2012Lillie P.J. Berthoud T.K. Powell T.J. Lambe T. Mullarkey C. Spencer A.J. et al.Preliminary assessment of the efficacy of a T-cell-based influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, in humans.Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012; 55: 19-25https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis327Crossref PubMed Scopus (209) Google Scholar), Coughlan et al., 2018Coughlan L. Sridhar S. Payne R. et al.Heterologous two-dose vaccination with simian adenovirus and poxvirus vectors elicits long-lasting cellular immunity to influenza virus a in healthy adults.EBioMedicine. 2018; 29 (this issue): 146-154Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar determined the safety of heterologous vaccination with the same matrix protein-1 (M1) and NP moieties delivered by two different viral vectors in younger and older people. Vaccine safety was assessed and stimulation of T cell responses measured by interferon-γ ELISPOT. Encouragingly, both vaccines were well-tolerated and when used sequentially 8 weeks apart significantly increased M1- and NP-stimulated T cell responses in vitro; importantly, responses were maintained long-term, at least in younger people (>18 months), a significant advance over the natural retention of T cell responses after infection, which tend to wane quite rapidly (Hayward et al., 2015Hayward A.C. Wang L. Goonetilleke N. Fragaszy E.B. Bermingham A. Copas A. et al.Natural T cell-mediated protection against seasonal and pandemic influenza. Results of the flu watch cohort study.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015; 191: 1422-1431https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201411-1988OCCrossref PubMed Scopus (171) Google Scholar). Similar responses were seen in the elderly but unfortunately they were not followed up beyond 6 months. Thus it remains undetermined whether responses would still be enhanced at later times in the elderly as well as the young, which is likely to be important for protection. Nonetheless, the evidence is clear that as with other antigens, the heterologous prime-boost strategy reported here for the first time by Coughlan et al., 2018Coughlan L. Sridhar S. Payne R. et al.Heterologous two-dose vaccination with simian adenovirus and poxvirus vectors elicits long-lasting cellular immunity to influenza virus a in healthy adults.EBioMedicine. 2018; 29 (this issue): 146-154Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar using two different viral vectors delivering the same immunogens succeeded in enhancing T cell-mediated immunity in both younger and older people. It will be important to determine whether there are sex differences in the response to these vaccines, but the current study was too small to approach this question. Many other variables remain to be explored, especially when determining correlates of protection in older adults which must take the effects of frailty into account. It will also be important to establish whether the Cytomegalovirus serostatus of the vaccinees or other factors such as diabetes influence their response, because studies have shown that these variables may not affect antibody responses but can impact markedly on T cell responses (Haq et al., 2017Haq K. Fulop T. Tedder G. Gentleman B. Garneau H. Meneilly G.S. et al.Cytomegalovirus seropositivity predicts a decline in the T cell but not the antibody response to influenza in vaccinated older adults independent of type 2 diabetes status.J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017; 72: 1163-1170https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw216Crossref PubMed Scopus (29) Google Scholar). However, no data on CMV serostatus, diabetes, use of beta-blockers (Pawelec, 2017Pawelec G. Are lower antibody responses to influenza vaccination in cytomegalovirus-seropositive older adults the result of beta adrenergic blockade?.Brain Behav. Immun. 2017; 61: 12-13https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2016.11.016Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar) etc. are available in the present paper, but these are details that can be accounted for in larger-scale trials. Although a major limitation recognized by the authors is the lack of documentation of any clinical protection in this small study, it is argued that their immune monitoring of T cell responses following vaccination suggests that efficacy should be enhanced. This assertion was made on the basis of a previous small challenge study in which protection was directly correlated with the T cell measures tested in the present study (Lillie et al., 2012Lillie P.J. Berthoud T.K. Powell T.J. Lambe T. Mullarkey C. Spencer A.J. et al.Preliminary assessment of the efficacy of a T-cell-based influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, in humans.Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012; 55: 19-25https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis327Crossref PubMed Scopus (209) Google Scholar). The pilot data presented in Coughlan et al., 2018Coughlan L. Sridhar S. Payne R. et al.Heterologous two-dose vaccination with simian adenovirus and poxvirus vectors elicits long-lasting cellular immunity to influenza virus a in healthy adults.EBioMedicine. 2018; 29 (this issue): 146-154Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar clearly warrant larger trials assessing efficacy of clinical protection in the real world, especially in the elderly, and close monitoring of the immune responses enhanced by the vaccines. The authors declared no conflicts of interest. Heterologous Two-Dose Vaccination with Simian Adenovirus and Poxvirus Vectors Elicits Long-Lasting Cellular Immunity to Influenza Virus A in Healthy AdultsA two dose heterologous vaccination regimen of MVA/ChAdOx1 NP + M1 was safe and immunogenic in young and older adults, offering a promising vaccination strategy for inducing long-term broadly cross-reactive protection against influenza A. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,092
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,304 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEBioMedicineMême sujetInfluenza Virus Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207