A250 UNRESEQUABLE AND METASTATIC PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA IN THE ELDERLY: A 10-YEAR SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in Canada and mainly affects individuals older than 60 years of age. Because of its retroperitoneal location, pancreatic cancer follows a relatively silent clinical course and is more often diagnosed at an advanced stage. When faced with a diagnosis of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, patients may be offered palliative chemotherapy. Unfortunately, a paucity of data exists regarding the use of chemotherapeutic agents in the elderly population with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this study is to obtain adequate profiling of the elderly patients with pancreatic cancer to better assess factors influencing outcomes and decision-making. This is a retrospective observational study of all patients aged older than 75 years old with a diagnosis of unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer at the CHUS between June 2005 and June 2015. Data was retrieved using the local patient database program Ariane. During the study period, 225 patients were included according to the entry criteria. Median age at diagnosis was 82 years old with a slight female gender predominance (52% vs 48%). Location of the primary tumor was in the head of the pancreas in 46% of cases, and evenly distributed between the pancreatic body and tail. Diagnosis was made by the general practitioners or gastroenterologists in 73.4% of cases. High blood pressure, diabetes mellitus and coronary atherosclerosis were the most frequently encountered comorbidities. Other biochemistry parameters at diagnosis suggested a more fragile population; median albumin level of 32 g/L, median creatinine value of 155 µmol/L and minor anemia (median = 11.7 g/dL). Among all patients, only 10 opted for palliative chemotherapy. ECOG status was unfortunately far from uniformly documented, although among the 10 patients treated, all had either ECOG 0 or 1 scores. Nine received Gemcitabine as first line whereas one patient was treated with Folfirinox. Seven completed the treatment with the standard regimen dosage for each cycle. Patients received a median of 5 cycles and end of treatment was dictated by severe asthenia complicating treatment. Only 2 patients, non-responders, received second-line agents (5FU/LV) that were subsequently stopped, again for non-response. Results of this unicentric observational retrospective study suggest an overall diminished clinical performance status in elderly patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer when compared to their younger counterparts. Due to our small sample size, it remains difficult to draw conclusions on ideal patient selection criterion and palliative treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer in the elderly. The present study does, however, underline the dire need for further studies on the matter. None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».