MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2794331398

3-D Imaging of Root Architecture Using Multichannel GPR

2018· dissertation· en· W2794331398 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueGeophysical Methods and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGround-penetrating radarArchitectureComputer scienceGeologyRemote sensingGeographyArchaeologyRadar
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Root biomass accounts for about 25% of the carbon storage in mid-latitude forests. Estimation of root biomass for carbon cycling studies requires either direct measurement by excavation of root systems, or remote measurement using ground penetrating radar (GPR) or other geophysical methods. This study evaluated the ability of a 2-GHz multi-channel GPR system (IDS Hi-BrigHT) to detect and map white pine roots in managed forest near Turkey Point, southern Ontario. The GPR system employed eight dual-polarized antenna pairs separated at 10 cm intervals. GPR data were acquired as overlapping swaths (2 cm line spacing, 0.4 cm inline) across a 25-m2 test site (TP74-R) containing a juvenile white pine tree. Radargrams were processed to full 3-D radar volumes for time slicing and interpretation of root architecture and comparison with the excavated root network.
\nRadargram signal processing was successful in suppressing airwave and other background noise and improved the detection of root diffractions on radargrams. The majority of roots were found in the rooting zone at a depth of 5-40 cm. Roots as small as 0.5 cm were detected with the 2-GHz frequency, but many roots <1.5 cm diameter could not be detected as continuous root structures. Root detection was strongly dependent on root orientation; large, coarse roots (>3-5 cm) were imaged as continuous root segments when oriented perpendicular to GPR profiles. Roots intersecting GPR profiles at angles <30-45 degrees were either imaged incompletely or not detected on radargrams. The highest rate of root detection was achieved with horizontally polarized (HH) antennas (dipole axis parallel with the root structures). Isosurface root models constructed from the Hilbert-transformed radargrams allowed mapping of the 3-D dimensional root architecture for large (> 3-5 cm diameter) roots. Isosurface models provide a means for estimating the coarse root volume for large roots and could be employed in future work to monitor temporal changes in root biomass by repeat survey at the same measurement site.
\nRadargram signal processing was successful in suppressing airwave and other background noise and improved the detection of root diffractions on radargrams. The majority of roots were found in the rooting zone at a depth of 5-40 cm. Roots as small as 0.5 cm were detected with the 2-GHz frequency, but many roots <1.5 cm diameter could not be detected as continuous root structures. Many roots were not detected due to dependence of root reflection amplitude on root orientation. Roots oriented at >30-45 degrees to the survey swaths were imaged incompletely or not detected. Most large coarse roots (>5 cm diameter) were mapped as continuous structures when the root orientation was either parallel to, or perpendicular to the GPR transects. The highest rate of root detection was achieved with the horizontally polarized (HH) antennas, with the dipole axis perpendicular to the root structures. Isosurface root models constructed from the Hilbert-transformed radargrams allowed mapping of the 3-D dimensional root architecture for large (> 3-5 cm diameter) roots. The isosurface models provide a means for estimating the coarse volume and belowground biomass but further work is required to improve 3-D image resolution to allow detection of the entire root network. The method could be employed to measure the temporal changes in root biomass by conducting repeat surveys at the same measurement site.
\nRadargram signal processing was successful in suppressing airwave and other background noise and improved the detection of root diffractions on radargrams. The majority of roots were found above a depth of 40 cm with the root zone being detected at a depth of10-15 cm. Roots as small as 0.5 cm were detected with the 2-GHz frequency, but many roots <1.5 cm diameter could not be detected as continuous root structures. Many roots were not detected due to dependence of root reflection amplitude on root orientation. Roots oriented at >30-45 degrees to the survey swaths were imaged incompletely or not detected. Most large coarse roots (>5 cm diameter) were mapped as continuous structures when the root orientation was either parallel to, or perpendicular to the GPR transects. The highest rate of root detection was achieved with the horizontally polarized (HH) antennas, with the dipole axis perpendicular to the root structures. Isosurface root models constructed from the Hilbert-transformed radargrams allowed mapping of the 3-D dimensional root architecture for large (> 3-5 cm diameter) roots. The isosurface models provide a means for estimating the coarse volume and belowground biomass but further work is required to improve 3-D image resolution to allow detection of the entire root network.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,900
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle