MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2794554030 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dey022

Decreased PECAM1-mediated TGF-β1 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium in women with recurrent implantation failure

2018· article· en· W2794554030 sur OpenAlexaff
Feng Guo, Chenchen Si, Mingjuan Zhou, Jingwen Wang, Dan Zhang, Peter C. K. Leung, Bufang Xu, Aijun Zhang

Notice bibliographique

RevueHuman Reproduction · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueReproductive System and Pregnancy
Établissements canadiensBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesChinese Medical AssociationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
Mots-clésEndometriumAndrologyStromal cellEmbryoInfertilityTransforming growth factorEmbryo transferUnexplained infertilityBiologyMenstrual cycleMedicineGynecologyPregnancyInternal medicineEndocrinologyCell biologyGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

STUDY QUESTION: Is recurrent implantation failure (RIF) associated with decreased expression of platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM1) and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) in the endometrium during the implantation window? SUMMARY ANSWER: The present study demonstrates that the expression of PECAM1 and TGF-β1 is significantly decreased in the mid-secretory endometrium in women with RIF, which may account for embryo implantation failure. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: RIF has become a bottleneck issue that hampers the improvement of pregnancy rates in IVF-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The causes of RIF are complex and may involve the dysregulation of various growth factors, metabolites, and inflammatory cytokines. At present, the precise pathogenesis of RIF has not been elucidated. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective case-control study. Endometrial tissue samples were obtained from January 2014 to December 2016 from two groups of women who had undergone IVF (RIF group, 22 women who underwent ≥3 ETs including a total of ≥4 good-quality embryos without pregnancy, control group, 18 women who conceived in their first treatment cycle). At the same time, samples were obtained from 18 women with infertility secondary to tubal factor in the early proliferative, late proliferative and mid-secretory phases of the menstrual cycle (n = 6 per group). Samples used for isolation of primary human endometrial epithelial cells and stromal cells (HEECs and HESCs) were collected in December 2017 from six women with infertility secondary to tubal factor. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We investigated gene expression using integrative whole genome expression microarray analysis, including differentially expressed gene screening, principal component analysis, and functional enrichment analysis. RT-qPCR, western blotting, immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence co-localization analysis and short hairpin RNA (shRNA) plasmid transfection in Ishikawa cell line, HEECs and HESCs were used to investigate the expression of PECAM1 and TGF-β1. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Integrative data mining of whole-genome expression profiles identified cell adhesion as a key regulator in RIF. Database retrieval and literature review screened several novel cell adhesion-related genes that might participate in embryo implantation, which include PECAM1, intercellular adhesion molecule 2 (ICAM2), integrin subunit β2 (ITGB2), selectin P (SELP) and TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (TEK). Among these targets, the mRNA and protein levels of PECAM1 were significantly lower in the RIF group than those in the control group. During the menstrual cycles of women with secondary infertility, the protein expression level of PECAM1 was the lowest in early proliferative phase, slightly increased in late proliferative phase and was the highest in mid-secretory phase. While the expression level of HOXA10, an endometrial receptivity marker, kept at a low level in early proliferative phase and increased in late proliferative phase, then maintained at a high level in the mid-secretory phase. Furthermore, TGF-β1, mediated by PECAM1, was also decreased significantly in the RIF group. Using shRNA-based approach, we demonstrated that the depletion of PECAM1 significantly decreased the expression of TGF-β1 in Ishikawa cells, as well as in primary HEECs and HESCs. These results indicated that PECAM1 and TGF-β1 might play a pivotal role in modulating endometrial receptivity. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although we have shown that PECAM1 and TGF-β1 were down-regulated in the women with RIF, the molecular mechanism of the effect of the factors on the endometrial receptivity remain unclear. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings provide insight into the contribution of PECAM1 and TGF-β1 in regulating implantation, which could be used to develop potential therapeutic methods for RIF. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81771656 and 81370763), Special fund for clinical research of the Chinese Medical Association (No. 16020480664), and the Merck Serono China Research Fund for Fertility Agreement. The authors have no competing interests.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations69
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHuman ReproductionMême sujetReproductive System and PregnancyTravaux en français237 207