S246. PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE DANISH VERSION OF BNSS (BNSS-DA)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The concept of negative symptoms (NS) has been known since early 19th century but the development of assessment instruments and treatment methods has yet proved inadequate. The Brief Negative Symptoms Scale (BNSS) was designed to evaluate NS according to a consensus definition by the National Institute of Mental Health from 2005. This study examines the validity and reliability of the Danish version of BNSS (BNSS-Da). 49 participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included, counting in- and outpatients as well as users of community housing facilities. Participants were assessed with BNSS-Da, Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), St. Hans Rating Scale for extrapyramidal syndromes (SHRS), Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), Trail Making Test A and B, (TMT-A/B) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). 19 of included subjects had their BNSS-Da interviews rated separately by two raters in order to evaluate interrater agreement. The convergent and divergent validity of BNSS-Da was assessed by its relationship with the aforementioned scales and tests. Of 49 included subjects, 45 were diagnosed with schizophrenia and 4 with schizoaffective disorder. The mean age was 33.1 (SD: 10.8) years and 65.3% were male. Mean duration of illness was 9.7 (SD: 9.2) years and the mean PANSS total score was 65.7 (SD: 17.6). Interrater reliability for BNSS-Da was estimated by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient based on a mean-rating (k=2), absolute-agreement, 2-way mixed-effects model, which showed to be 0.953 (95%CI: 0.880–0.982). To examine convergent and divergent validity, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were calculated. PANSS negative and SANS total (subgroup, n=38) were both well correlated with BNSS-Da (ρ=0.813, p<0.001 and ρ=0.852, p<0.001). Also, BNSS-Da seemed to correlate well with PANSS total (ρ=0.736, p<0.001), and to a lesser extend PANSS positive (ρ=0.552, p<0.001) and PANSS general (ρ=0.628, p<0.001). More infirm correlations were found between BNSS-Da and CDSS (ρ=0.314, p=0.028), PSP (ρ=-0.480, p<0.001), DSST (subgroup, n=47, ρ=0.393, p=0.006) and TMT-B (subgroup, n=39, ρ=0.357, p=0.025), while no significant correlations were found with TMT-A (subgroup, n=39) or SHRS, except the Parkinsonism subscale (ρ=0.420, p=0.003). The interrater reliability for the BNSS-Da proved to be excellent. Regarding convergent validity, the scale correlated well with the standardized assessment tools for NS, indicating the presence of a common construct of NS. Social functioning, as measured by PSP, was fairly correlated with BNSS-Da, demonstrating how NS are associated with functional outcome. As for divergent validity, the poor correlations between BNSS-Da and CDSS and most domains of SHRS suggested a good capacity for distinguishing between primary NS and NS secondary to depression or adverse effects of neuroleptics. However, the Parkinsonism subscale of SHRS had a rather firm correlation with BNSS-Da, probably because lack of facial expressions is measured in both scales. PANSS positive also seemed to correlate with BNSS-Da. This correlation assumedly stems from NS secondary to positive symptoms, since the present study included acutely psychotic subjects, unlike most other studies on translations of BNSS. The cognitive tests, TMT-A/B and DSST, were infirmly correlated to BNSS-Da, illustrating that cognitive function and NS likely are associated yet still separable through BNSS-Da. In conclusion, BNSS-Da holds appropriate psychometric properties in terms of reliability and validity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».