MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2794659743 · doi:10.5325/jjewiethi.4.1.0103

In Memoriam: Rabbi Dr. Neil Gillman

2018· article· en· W2794659743 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Plevan

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Jewish Ethics · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJudaismExistentialismTheologyStatement (logic)PhilosophySubject (documents)Order (exchange)Religious studiesSociologyClassicsHistoryEpistemology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rabbi Dr. Neil Gillman died last November 23, having been ill for several years after treatment for cancer. Born in Quebec City, Canada, Gillman studied philosophy at McGill University in Montreal and then attended rabbinical school at the Jewish Theological Seminary, where he would spend his entire career, first as the dean of its Rabbinical School and later as a Professor of Jewish Philosophy. While raised in a traditional Jewish home, his path to the rabbinate and a career teaching Jewish theology was inspired by an encounter with Will Herberg, the noted Jewish social thinker and existentialist theologian, while at McGill. After completing his rabbinical studies, he continued working and teaching at JTS and completed a doctorate in Religious Studies at Columbia University, where he wrote his dissertation on Gabriel Marcel's religious epistemology, a subject that became his central philosophical concern.His early interest in religious existentialism and its emphasis on confrontation with personal belief and meaning became one of Gillman's core commitments as a theologian and as a teacher. Gillman insisted that modern Jews should clarify their own theological commitments in a personal way in order to connect to the teachings and practices of the Jewish tradition. The typical final assignment in almost any Neil Gillman class was the writing of a personal theological statement, a task to which he provided a guide in the final chapter of Sacred Fragments, the most significant statement of his theological approach. Under his influence the personal theological statement became and remains a standard part of the application to the Rabbinical School at JTS. The personal theological statement gave a generation of rabbis, cantors, educators, and lay students the opportunity to discuss their qualms and questions about classical Jewish theology, explore new possibilities, and renew their faith from the “sacred fragments” of traditional images of God.As a thought leader for Conservative Judaism, Gillman's theological work owed a debt to two of his teachers at JTS, Mordecai Kaplan and Abraham Joshua Heschel. Gillman followed Kaplan's theological naturalism because he did not think we could fully retrieve the pre-modern conception of God as a supernatural personal being. At the same time, he understood that for many, himself included, Kaplan's naturalistic theology did not capture the emotive or spiritual power of lived religious experience, both in traditional Jewish ritual and in the everyday world. Heschel's poetic writing and teaching taught him to appreciate the way that the images and metaphors for God in the tradition allowed us to experience the divine within the world, to “see God,” as Gillman often put in explaining his debt to Heschel.To strike a balance between these two aspects of his theology, Gillman drew on Paul Tillich's notion of religious language as a mythic, in the sense of a socio-linguistic pattern of thinking that expresses and shapes the commitments of a community. The concept of myth allowed him to weave the personal imagery for God of classical Jewish texts in his theology without the baggage of supernatural metaphysical commitments. He applied this approach the theological issue of resurrection of the dead, which he explored in his 1997 book, The Death of Death. Again driven by existentialist themes, Gillman noted that American Jews' discomfort with resurrection theology mirrored their difficulty discussing death itself. His own understanding of resurrection as a mythic concept sought to highlight the religious significance of the human body and return to an affirmation of divine power over life and death. As with all his teachings, he found ways to challenge a generation of American Jews and their spiritual leaders to grapple with, to use Tillich's phrase, matters of ultimate concern. His teachings live on in hundreds of students who learned with him and have responded to his invitation to find their own ways for speaking to God and about God.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,070
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,235

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,011
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0700,054

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,299 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Jewish EthicsMême sujetJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesTravaux en français237 207